this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
151 points (81.6% liked)

Technology

75205 readers
3200 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago (8 children)

I work in finance (IT side) if the bubble is gonna burst all the ppl making money off of it haven't got the memo and I trust their collective intelligence over this woman.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 17 points 1 day ago (10 children)

And then AI will just go away and everything will go back to normal again, yes? It'll suddenly stop working and so people will stop using it for all the things they're currently using it for.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (21 children)

people will stop using it for all the things they're currently using it for

They will when AI companies can no longer afford to eat their own costs and start charging users a non-subsidized price. How many people would keep using AI if it cost $1 per query? $5? $20?

OpenAI lost $5 billion last year. Billion, with a B. Even their premium customers lose them money on every query, and eventually the faucet of VC cash propping this whole thing up is gonna run dry when investors inevitably realize that there's no profitable business model to justify this technology. At that point, AI firms will have no choice but to pass their costs on to the customer, and there's no way the customer is going to stick around when they realize how expensive this technology actually is in practice.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are free open models you can go and download right now, that are better than SOTA 12-18 months ago, and that cost you less to run on a gaming PC than playing COD does. Even if openai, anthropic et al disappeared without a trace tomorrow AI wouldnt go away.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And those are useful tools, which will always be around. The current “AI” industry bubble is predicated on total world domination by an AGI, which is not technically possible given the underpinnings of the LLM methodology. Sooner or later, the people with the money will realize this. They’re stupid, so it may take a while.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago

The post I was replying to was saying

people will stop using it for all the things they're currently using it for

They will when AI companies can no longer afford to eat their own costs and start charging users a non-subsidized price.

i.e. people will stop using AI when user have to pay the "real" price (what this is is left unspecified and an exercise to the reader to figure out). My point was that even if the AI price from those provided to infinity AI usage wouldnt drop to zero like they imply.

[–] arararagi@ani.social 1 points 1 day ago

that's fine though, people aren't mad about models you can run locally, even though now it takes 30 seconds instead of 5 to get a response from my ERP bot.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Absolutely not. AI tech will continue to be pushed by C-suites convinced they can surplus a fraction of their workforce eventually. The change will be that most of the investments in AI companies will disappear overnight and most will go belly-up. It will erase a significant fraction of everyone's pension funds, and federal governments around the world will pour public funds into propping up the larger companies so that they don't go under too. Heads they win, tails you lose.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yes, just like the internet died after the dotcom bust.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dk841143@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

I highly doubt it will, but I would not be sad if it did.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] petrjanda@gonzo.markets 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

With Shiller PE at 40x, only fools are investing into the market right now. History will be the judge again in due time. It's a repeat of the 1920s.

[–] Lag@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where do you invest then? Because keeping all cash sounds bad at the moment too.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

There are plenty of profitable companies with lower PE ratios.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›