this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
375 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

34543 readers
3799 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Why is he staining so hard? He's freakin' superman

[–] Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The idea is he's straining so hard because he's trying to use the exact amount of force he needs to stop the train without harming anyone inside. Too much force on the train and everyone in the train gets injured or killed, too little and it doesn't stop in time to save the kid, and I believe in this one he didn't have the option of just grabbing the kid because he would have been hurt too badly from the sudden acceleration.

If you've ever tried to assemble something where you've gotta snap together two pretty fragile pieces it's a similar idea. You absolutely can generate way more than the force needed to get the job done, the difficulty is in having the pieces survive the attempt.

I can tell you I have experienced it with models and computer components and you'd absolutely think I was arm wrestling a God with how much I was straining trying to push those parts together without breaking them.

Edit: I'm not sure which comic this is actually from but when trying to find what issue this was from I saw people saying something about explosives on the train too? Not sure how accurate that is but the idea goes to support the usual thing with writing Superman that he often doesn't have an easy resolution to whatever crisis he's facing.

If the explosives thing is accurate then taking the time to move the kid means the train likely gets closer to more people an explosion would hurt. Would it be enough to matter? Maybe not, but Clark would pretty reasonably believe it would.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

But then isn't he accelerating the people on the train just as much?

[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

Yes. In the opposite direction, gradually. It’s called deceleration. The mass of the train would spread the impact of Superman hitting and slowing it across the entire train, rather than the frame of a tiny human going from not very fast, to super man flying speed. At least that’s how I’m rationalizing it with rudimentary physics. I’m probably wrong.

[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There's a whole locomotive between them to dampen the impact.

Same reason why modern cars are designed to crumple. It absorbs more of the impact before it reaches the people inside.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

So only the first ten or so cars will be scenes of unbelievable carnage. Meanwhile, he could have simply picked up the kid and cushioned him from the impact.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

/Kidsarefuckingstupid

[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Cpt. Obvious here: If he touched the child, a murder of Karens would descend upon him and release a shitstorm as if a black man walked past their dead, green painted front lawn.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 16 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure it's a Complaint of Karens. Or do you really associate the Karen with beautiful and intelligent crows?

[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org 12 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I understand what you are saying, but I strongly disagree. Karens weaponize their karen-ness sometimes to a lethal degree. So „murder of Karens“ is quite fitting imho. A group of Crows on the other hand should be called something entirely different, that does their beauty and intelligence justice. Something like: A „conference“ or a „council“ of crows.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 5 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Then it couuld be an Assault of Karens or a Homicide of Karens.

[–] Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I personally like "Litigation of Karens" for how often their involvement tends to involve them threatening to sue or press charges on someone.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

Oooh, that one is good.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

I believe it’s called a HoA

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 38 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Technically what Superman did was correct. Superman COULD scoop the child up and move him out of the way, but that sort of sudden acceleration would be a lot like getting hit by a train.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 28 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That goes for the people on the train too though. If he had so little time that he couldn't move the kid 2 meters without giving him whiplash, then stopping the train in that same amount of time would send everybody on the train flying to the front of their cars at whatever speed the train was going.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Why are we assuming it's a passenger train? It's probably just a choice between a small child or a middle aged conductor who did survive according to the illustration if only because they decided to draw him in afterwards as a form of censorship.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 1 points 13 minutes ago

I only assume that it's not an autonomous train. And I'm not making any points about morality here, that sounds exhausting and I'd rather leave that to a lawyer or judge. I'm just saying, from a physics standpoint, moving the girl instead of stopping the training would've saved no fewer lives and not damaged any infrastructure. Just some constructive feedback Supes, I love what you're doin ♥️♥️♥️

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 1 points 58 minutes ago (1 children)

Please pardon me if I’m missing something obvious. I don’t understand how censorship is involved.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 2 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

Well if they didn't draw him in we'd all be assuming Superman murdered that guy just like user Oops just declared.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 1 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

Okay, thank you. I didn’t understand your use of the word “censorship”. That’s not common usage in American English, which is all I speak.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 1 points 43 minutes ago

Look, if you were to retroactively remove implications or references to morbidity, gore, and death then that would be censorship exactly how everyone uses the word.

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is not like a falling kid problem...

If he had more than 0.5 seconds to move the kid he could have moved him 1.5 meters without severely hurting him. On the other hand, if he had less than 0.5 seconds he's now killed everyone on the train.

[–] ImWaitingForRetcons@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s long been a fan Theory that Superman can cover some form of durability to the items he handles, otherwise a lot of the larger items he handles would crumble/collapse under their own weight, or people he carries would be crushed/chopped to chunks.

[–] Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't they try to make something like that canon years ago? That Superman has some kind of field he extends to objects he touches that in part dampens some of the physics implications of the movements he's shown to be able to do carrying objects and people that don't immediately rip themselves apart from G forces? Or am I misremembering?

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

They did that for superboy at one point. He is said to have tactile telekinesis.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago

I read something about his old outfit suggesting that this was an early outing. Superman hadn’t quite worked out the physics/consequences of using his powers yet.

Also, by the look on the conductor’s face, the train wasn’t moving very fast.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

He did it all the time in movies tho.

And the sudden deceleration of that train mean whoever in that train is not gonna have a good time lol

Trains can go a long way with no brakes. It'll probably hurt lots of people.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] funkajunk@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Bro's got a hog fr

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'm glad I'm not the only one that noticed that.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 15 points 1 day ago

Why the hell is bowl cut playing on the train tracks? And who let him get that haircut?

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Weak. You want to stop a train quickly, just suplex it.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trolley problem? How about a trolley solution?

Just released, cheap as heck. Played 15 minutes so far and laughed my ass off.

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

I saw that yesterday. But it had mixed reviews.

[–] ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Hell yes. I'm playing this tomorrow. Thank you