_stranger_

joined 2 years ago
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

I would imagine someone would still need to actually sue the Internet Archive for this to be a problem for them. The vast majority probably won't care, and they'll likely just have to deal with whatever the equivalent of a DMCA takedown notice is for them.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Absolute cancer of a meat bag probably thinks he just invented taxes.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They could move to a voluntary model in the worst case, they don't profit from it. Institute a "robots.txt" style protocol for signalling opt-in intent to volunteer for scraping by the archive.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

These are all upgrades from what we've got, so I'm good.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yep, the Starr report was basically hundreds of pages of mostly legally irrelevant sensationalism, and Republicans charged taxpayers 40 million to make it.