this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Canada

11791 readers
621 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Liberal Party members have chosen former central banker Mark Carney to be their new leader and the next prime minister of Canada.

Carney secured enough votes in the first round of voting to win the job, party president Sachit Mehra announced.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was never a chance a woman would win as leader. The Liberals claim to be feminist but have never had a female in charge running the Liberal party.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Freeland has polled fairly poorly against Poilievre and this is what everyone i know voted on - who can defeat him. Then there's some of the bad takes she made. She sounded austerity-ish, made some anti-woke statements which play right in the cons' hands.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to mention that she fiercely opposed electoral reform while Mark Carney gave a maybe.

[–] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The broad Canadian public is against woke policies. People want meritocracy, not identity. Read the public polling of the amount of people who support same sex marriage, it's going down. Look at the polling numbers of the public turning against the ideology of transgenderism.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please piss off to conservative lemmy’s. Or to the US. You have no coherent explanation of what is “woke” except for maybe it’s something undefined that you don’t personally like. You don’t speak for the broad Canadian public. Stop inflecting garbage US nonsense here. We’ve had gay marriage for more than 25 years and it’s never going away.

[–] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When you go outside, talk with random strangers and ask for their take on woke and check if people out in public support gay marriage. Get people;s opinion's face to face that you don't know previously, the internet is not the real world.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Congrats. You’re my first block on lemmy.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

They're a transphobic loser, you won't miss much.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Reminder of the Liberal's record on proportional representation: "Liberals never wanted to “make every vote count.”… Electoral reform has become a bonbon offered at election. As far back as 1919, Liberals have campaigned on the promise of proportional representation"

Mark Carney's position on electoral reform: "open". However...

  1. He’s an economist, and the mathematics pairs quite nicely with the mathematics of electoral systems.
  2. His public persona is that he is intelligent. But when asked specifically about electoral reform and proportional representation, he says he’s uncertain and open to exploring options? Why would someone as smart as him be uncertain about ensuring every vote counts.
[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Means he's unfamiliar with the issue, or doesn't want to take a position lol

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

Given the Liberal's failings on proportional representation, I tend to think it's the latter: he doesn't want to take a position

[–] IslandLife@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Too bad for Chrystia Freeland. I think she would have been a great PM. I watched her speak a few times, and she is well-spoken, smart, and has that little edge like she'd really destroy you if you forced her to.

I would have voted for either, though, and I'm happy for Mark Carney. He'll do a great job.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

She will be invaluable to the country going forward.