Four LXCs
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
118 points (98.4% liked)
Selfhosted
55801 readers
501 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
-
No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I know using work as an example is cheating, but around 1400-1500 to 5000-6000 depending on load throughout the day.
At home it's 12.
I was watching a video yesterday where an org was churning 30K containers a day because they didn't profile their application correctly and scaled their containers based on a misunderstanding how Linux deals with CPU scheduling.
Yeah that shit is more common than people think.
A big part of the business of cloud providers is that most orgs have no idea how to do shit. Their enterprise consultants are also wildly variable in competence.
There was also a large amount of useless bullshit that I needed to cut down since being hired at my current spot, but the amount of containers is actually warranted. We do have that traffic, which is both happy and sad, since while business is booming, I have to deal with this.
I have 43 running, and this was a great reminder to do some cleanup. I can probably reduce my count by 5-10.
Zero. Either it’s just a service with no wrappers, or a full VM.
Why a full VM, that seems like a ton of overhead
For some convoluted networking things it’s easier for me to have a full “machine” as it were
I still haven't figured out containers. 🙁
How come? What do you use to run them and what is it you have a hard time with?
load more comments
(6 replies)
Zero.
About 35 NixOS VMs though, each running either a single service (e.g. Paperless) or a suite (Sonarr and so on plus NZBGet, VPN,...).
There's additionally a couple of client VMs. All of those distribute over 3 Proxmox hosts accessing the same iSCSI target for VM storage.
SSL and WireGuard are terminated at a physical firewall box running OpnSense, so with very few exceptions, the VMs do not handle any complicated network setup.
A lot of those VMs have zero state, those that do have backup of just that state automated to the NAS (simply via rsync) and from there everything is backed up again through borg to an external storage box.
In the stateless case, deploying a new VM is a single command; in the stateful case, same command, wait for it to come up, SSH in (keys are part of the VM images), run restore-<whatever>.
On an average day, I spend 0 minutes managing the homelab.
load more comments
(6 replies)
61 containers in 26 docker files.
How it started : 0
Max : 0
Now : 0
Iso27002 and provenance validation goes brrrrr
49, I could imagine running all of those bare would be hard with dependencies
Am not using docker yet. Currently I just have one Proxmox LXC, but am planning on selfhosting a lot more in the near future...
Awesome! I like ProxMox. Check out the Helper Scripts if you haven't already. Some people like them, some don't.
Uh.. Probably somewhere around 150?
12 LXCs and 2 VMs on proxmox. Big fan of managing all the backups with the web ui (It's very easy to back to my NAS) and the helper scripts are pretty nice too. Nothing on docker right now, although i used to have a couple in a portainer LXC.
59 according to docker info.
Hot damn. That is a far better way then counting the lines from docker ps
Hot damn
That literally got a snort, because I feel the same way when I find a much easier/cleaner way of doing something.
I don't use them. I'm using OpenBSD on my server which don't support this feature.
No jails?
It's FreeBSD feature
13 with podman on openSUSE MicroOS.
i used to have a few more but wasn't using them enough so i cut them.
13 in a docker LXC, most of my stuff runs on 13 other dedicated LXCs
I'm running 3 or 4 I think... I'm more into dedicated VMs for some reason, so my important things are running in VMs in a proxmox cluster.
I recently went from 0 to 1. Reinstalled my VPS under debian, and decided to run my forgejo instance with their rootless container. Mostly as a learning experience, but also to easily decouple the forgejo version from whichever version my distro packages.
40 containers behind traefik, but I did just add a new sablier middleware to stop when iddle and start when first requested. Electricity is not cheap for me. But i got lucky to add 64GB RAM in my NAS and 128GB Ram in Desktop last march before prices went crazy
load more comments
(7 replies)
None. I run my services they way they are meant to be run. There is no point in containers for a small setup. Its kinda lazy and you miss out on how to install them.
Small setups can very easily turn into large setups without you noticing.
The only bare-metal setup I'd trust to be scaleable is Nix flakes (which I'm actually very interested in migrating to at some point)
load more comments
(3 replies)
two, one for running discord backup viewer webui and the other for archiveteam warrior containers
view more: next ›