this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
411 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

80503 readers
4060 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a blog post, Musk said the acquisition was warranted because global electricity demand for AI cannot be met with “terrestrial solutions,” and Silicon Valley will soon need to build data centers in space to power its AI ambitions.

This dumb fuck. Unfortunately, his boosters will be all-in on this messaging. Whatever.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago (15 children)

What advantage does space provide at all?

You have to transport heavy great into a place with no cooling capacity... What?

[–] rimu@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago

No advantage, in fact a massive disadvantage.

Fascists lie.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Hegar@fedia.io 15 points 2 days ago

Nationalize it. Take his company, his wealth and jail him for his crimes.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Datacenters on the bottom of the sea are useless because of the difficulties of hardware maintenance and the snake oil salesman is trying to sell out space datacenters now.

load more comments (1 replies)

I guess this is insurance for when the bubble pops. It helps justify the "too big to fail"

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

"Now they have to bail me out."

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

Uh oh, vibe-engineered rockets.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A million satellites he says. That's 100 satellites per starship launch. 5 times per day, every day, for five years. By the time you're done, the first ones are burned out and you have to do it all again. And that's assuming one GPU per satellite because solar panels even in space can't pull enough power to feed multiple of those hungry things.

[–] Iseja@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Energy is the least of their concerns, getting rid of the heat is a much bigger problem.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Data centers in space sounds like one hell of an expensive investment for something that has not once shown any profitability yet, and are in fact most likely about to burst its bubble in the near future.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How little of an understanding of how the natural world works do you need to have to think that data centers in space are a good idea? Nothing to say of economics and logistics. Or am I missing something big here?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›