this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
434 points (98.2% liked)

196

5489 readers
2321 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I listened to the Lolita podcast and it's a great one hosted by someone who was a fan of the work and it made an impact on her.

It seems so many interpret the story of Lolita to be a tragic love story like Kubrick and it seems Rowling. It seems as though the more sensible interpretation would be a story about abuse and power where you're made to empathize with the unreliable narrator, Humbert. I always get an ick when I hear people say it's a love story.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

Media literacy is not particularly high as of late

[–] hector@lemmy.today 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Is this all true? Jesus Christ, this Epstein corruption spread everywhere.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 hours ago

until further notice assume every billionaire is implicated

[–] standarduser@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I hate to be that person, is there a source for each bit of info? This is def something I’d like to come back to in future references.

[–] kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 hours ago

Yeah I hate Rowlings antics as much as the next lemming, but I'll never understand why posts like these have no references. I don't even take them seriously, the burden of proof is on the poster, not the reader.

Every claim should come with a direct link or reference.

[–] Vile_port_aloo@lemmy.world -3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for saying that! Was reading it and obviously not a fan of either named people, IMHO public death penalty should be brought back for preventing the course of justice! But wild accusations and click bait.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 17 points 4 hours ago

https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/news/edinburgh-news/edinburghs-jk-rowling-hits-back-33355200

Some news sources have picked it up.

She's denying it, but Steve Bannon denied knowing anything, when he worked directly with Epstein on a propaganda piece to get people to forget that he was a child sex trafficker. Rowling also just had her super yacht removed from all marine traffic services, no AIS, no port logs, nothing.

But TLDR, numbers 1, 3, and 4 have just been found in the Epstein files.

The others are also verifiable.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The fourth point is grammatically a bit awkward; not sure what it's saying

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 hours ago

so. epstein's cover story as a finacier was that if you wanted to get a thing funded or to get a project in front of someone who could greenlight it, you could go to him and he could introduce you. he was referred to as a matchmaker for money. the reality of course it turned out is that he was who oligarchs went to when they wanted to fuck a vulnerable child from the global south. so when people went to him to introduce them to someone else, how he knew whoever it was was from his experience as a professional sex pest.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 69 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Crucially, the invitation to JKR's play came in 2018, when Epstein was already in jail. You have to be a special kind of dumb to still invite him to a public event at that point. Compared to that, Bill Clinton's contacts in 2002-2003 have pretty decent plausible deniability - it's at least possible that he didn't know that Epstein was a pedo rapist + pedo pimp, since that was before any accusations against him became public.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago

Clinton knew. He had briefs from US intelligence, even after out of office, a practice the current president stopped as I understand, The best news service in the world.

[–] alter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 65 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Shoutout to when she made a character that gets mocked for wanting to end slavery and then cast a black woman to play her

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Hermione Granger? But she's not black... am I missing the joke somewhere?

[–] alter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 hours ago

Someone already explained, but the joke was mostly about the retroactive optics of two white teenage boys telling a black woman she’s being annoying about anti-slavery activism which… yeah

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Huh, never knew. I always assumed it was Emma Watson who narrated it.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It was the original run of cursed child in London that she was Hermione

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

Don't remind me of that work. Somehow the witch managed to produce a work rivalling the terribilit of her transphobia.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

IIRC there are only a couple characters who have their ethnicity specified in the books. But it has been a while since I read them.

JK Rowling's bookshelf

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 26 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I was too young and innocent to understand the evils of this world when I fell in love with the books. They were my escape in otherwise a shit childhood. I hate the author, but I cannot hate the stories that made my childhood better.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

I mean I loved Orson Scott Card's book Ender's Game and the get turned out to be a right-wing loon. It doesn't change how I feel about the book.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 13 points 5 hours ago

You're allowed to look back fondly while being aware of the problems. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Life is full of nuance.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago

Similarly, I enjoyed the movies even though the books weren’t my personal style. A whole lot of people were a part of that who don’t share any of her views or knew the type of person she was at the time.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 7 points 7 hours ago

There’s a lot to be against here, but to me, that last one is especially bad