this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
700 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

80503 readers
3535 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The article title is click bait here is the full article:

Wondering what your career looks like in our increasingly uncertain, AI-powered future? According to Palantir CEO Alex Karp, it’s going to involve less of the comfortable office work to which most people aspire, a more old fashioned grunt work with your hands.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum yesterday, Karp insisted that the future of work is vocational — not just for those already in manufacturing and the skilled trades, but for the majority of humanity.

In the age of AI, Karp told attendees at a forum, a strong formal education in any of the humanities will soon spell certain doom.

“You went to an elite school, and you studied philosophy; hopefully you have some other skill,” he warned, adding that AI “will destroy humanities jobs.”

Karp, who himself holds humanities degrees from the elite liberal arts institutions of Haverford College and Stanford Law, will presumably be alright. With a net worth of $15.5 billion — well within the top 0.1 percent of global wealth owners — the Palantir CEO has enough money and power to live like a feudal lord (and that’s before AI even takes over.)

The rest of us, he indicates, will be stuck on the assembly line, building whatever the tech companies require.

“If you’re a vocational technician, or like, we’re building batteries for a battery company… now you’re very valuable, if not irreplaceable,” Karp insisted. “I mean, y’know, not to divert to my usual political screeds, but there will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training.”

Now, there’s nothing wrong with vocational work or manufacturing. The global economy runs on these jobs. But in a theoretical world so fundamentally transformed by AI that intellectual labor essentially ceases to exist, it’s telling that tech billionaires like Karp see the rest of humanity as their worker bees.

It seems that the AI revolution never seems to threaten those who stand to profit the most from it — just the 99.9 percent of us building their batteries.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are they stupid as fuck? On the knowledge of whom does he think their models are trained? Idiotic thieves.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not just that, but "working with your hands" has been seen all kinds of machines automating people out of jobs for the past 200+ years, AI/LLM will only make automation more capable, and more undercutting of people's manual labor costs.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

AI/LLM will only make automation more capable

LLM, unlikely. ML, probably, but not as rapidly as the hype would suggest.

And yeah, the disruption caused by the industrial revolution, telecommunications, automobiles, computers and the internet all are likely to exceed any impact caused by broader use of LLMs, which are too costly to train and run, inherently too unreliable for safety-critical or health-critical use, too flaky for any use requiring auditability, and generally of unproven utility so far, outside of a few niche applications.

And I say this as a leader of a technical team that has successfull adopted ML in several use cases, and has evaluated several opportunities to use LLMs. So far, with LLMs, the game ain't worth the candle, even without considering the enormous environmental damage caused by their supporting infrastructure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

id also tell my competition to stop trying and get a real job if i felt like they were still a threat, you know, if i was an insecure, narcissistic, sociopath, with a visible coke addiction, and access to large swathes of investor capital, in an industry that fundamentally cannot turn a profit unless its through circular investment.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We "peasants" are the only reason the filthy rich have what they have, including food, and clean water to drink. They need us, we don't need them.

Fuck these useless leeches. Billionaires should not exist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry, buddy. I’ll burn down your fucking offices and data centers before I go back to manual labor.

I didn’t do 15 years of manual labor just to go back to that shit after I finally got out.

[–] segabased@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's crazy is how fragile their ai ecosystem is. The tech requires insane scaling in the form of data centers. We've hit the Moore's law limit, this tech isn't getting better in and of itself, it just gets better by adding more tpus and servers.

It all goes down if the data centers go down

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dipcart@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago

Hilarious that they've pivoted from assembly automation, which is feasible and meaningful and in fact is happening, to arts/humanities automation, which isn't really possible when you think about how training works.

A lot of menial tasks can be automated and that's probably fine... There's a lot of stupid meaningless shit we have to do everyday. And maybe we could eliminate that stuff from the grind considering its all arbitrary, or maybe automate it away.

Regardless, doesn't the idea that both sides of the aisle, vocational and office jobs, approaching automation mean that maybe we should start talking about things not costing anything anymore?

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Murder the elite with my bare hands? Welp guess i need to start working out.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

if working with my hands like a peasant paid what my job does, I'd do it in a heartbeat. fuck this mental exhaustion and stress, I'd rather be working the field eight hours a day for the same pay

AI is not coming for my job, which leads me to believe it's not coming for that many other 'skilled' jobs

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

comfortable office work to which most people aspire

What ? Do people even aspire to work in the first place ? And idk about you, but I'd rather have been a craftswoman if you could still live off of that.

You went to an elite school, and you studied philosophy; hopefully you have some other skill

You think AI can do PHILOSOPHY !? AI can barely put together one fucking function when coding, and you think it can do philosophy ? Either he's knowingly lying (he is) or he understands so little about philosophy that the AI can fool him (probably also true)

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Do people even aspire to work in the first place ?

I work because I'm used to the finer things in life, such as living indoors and not having to forage or hunt my dinner. Otherwise I'd just play music at a far less than professional standard.

On the other hand, my wife works because her work helps people. She'd do it even if she didn't get paid. But it's not manual work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

Can somebody seriously do something about these savages? Like seriously!

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Didn't Ford's CEO just say they wanted highschool graduates who could do math to be automotive techs making $120K a year?

Plumbers already make ridiculous amounts of money because there aren't enough of them.

The median age in my field 5-10 years ago was 55 years old and we aren't getting an influx of new A&P licensed techs still. The main way the Aviation industry gets it's techs these days is the military and that's not even a sure fire way.

Like. CEO's doing trades when? Because he's clearly mistaken if he thinks that it's not going to be CEO's and upper management people who get their jobs replaced by AI.

They keep trying to replace engineers, software devs and so on with AI at all the tech companies and then having to back out of that decision to keep things running.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Maybe they saw too many of us identifying that the biggest problem is the rich, rather than each other, so they're trying to hide behind a new manufactured enemy.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Fucking manipulate idiot.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Can someone take this insufferable prick out back with a shotgun already?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Posting clickbait is almost as bad as writing clickbait.

We want to be informed, not have our emotions manipulated for ad revenue.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

peasant hands can hold guns

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 26 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Assume for a moment that AI really was taking all of these types of jobs, which by the way, almost certainly includes CEOs. It would only be a matter of time before robots take those other jobs he's talking about.

A normal human of normal intelligence would see that and conclude that people simply wouldn't have to work anymore. And that therefore, everyone should have their basic necessities taken care of by their governments.

People would be free to do whatever they want, whether it be "humanities" work or creating things or whatever. We're no longer constrained by the fact that our lives depend on our usefulness in jobs to the ruling class.

Only a member of that ruling class would see themselves as indispensable and others as slave labor.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

Hey grok, what's the most efficient, yet emotionally satisfying way to liquidate our class of parasitic, pedophilic billionaires. Extra points for style!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›