this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
320 points (99.4% liked)

Memes

54218 readers
2210 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thefreepenguinalt@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 33 minutes ago

Hippity hoppity abolish intellectual property

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 minutes ago

This guy has the kind of face that made me completely unsurprised when the allegations from his sister came out

[–] her01n@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Copyright infringement is not theft, and it is not immoral. It has never been, and it will not start to be, just because a company we don't like is doing it.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 hours ago

Finally, based .world

💪

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago
[–] hamid@crazypeople.online 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Of all the problems I have with AI, intellectual property is not one of them.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Between all of the AI hype and the AI panic, my biggest concern is that the laws will be so poorly written that simple algorithms like A* will end up illegal and AI in general will be outlawed. We'll have a Butlerian Jihad because a bunch of daffy CEOs simply said their machines will replace humans when they can't. Our children will be forced to drink sapho juice and eat spice so they can work in a server farm made of humans.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

I can't wait for this stupid fucking bubble to pop.

You're just not thinking about all of the car companies that would benefit from having so many more cars to sell!

[–] mr_eckneim@feddit.org 26 points 1 day ago

Oh no oh god what would we all do if the AI race finally ended. How disasterous can something be OH NO …

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Protecting fair use is more important than any hate-boner toward chatbots.

[–] timmytbt@sh.itjust.works 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but AI scraping humanities creative output is not what I would consider fair use!

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works -3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Training is transformative use.

A gigabyte of linear algebra that can rap about the Silmarillion is plainly not just copying. It's not even large enough to contain a meaningful fragment of every book that shaped it.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 hour ago

Downvoters don't know what "fair use" means. Or do, but would rather work backwards from kneejerk opposition to an outcome.

A robot read every book in the library. That's what libraries are for. If it can't reproduce any book more closely than a Wikipedia summary, and serves a different purpose - that's a protected work.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Not true. If you could just take any car you wanted for a drive there would no need for car thieves.

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 22 hours ago

Why dont he just provide his own teachings

Start an ai class room so ai companies can pay indians to make videos on subjects for them