this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
756 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

80928 readers
4645 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Discord Alternatives

  • Lobste.rs;
  • Tildes.
  • Beginning with a phased global rollout to new and existing users in early March, users may be required to engage in an age-verification process to change certain settings or access sensitive content. This includes age-restricted channels, servers, or commands and select message requests.

    (page 2) 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 2 points 11 hours ago

    While this is certainly a big step in their enshittification process, the restrictions from just not doing it don't seem so bad.


    Content Filters: Discord users will need to be age-assured as adults in order to unblur sensitive content or turn off the setting.

    Age-gated Spaces – Only users who are age-assured as adults will be able to access age-restricted channels, servers, and app commands.

    Message Request Inbox: Direct messages from people a user may not know are routed to a separate inbox by default, and access to modify this setting is limited to age-assured adult users.

    Friend Request Alerts: People will receive warning prompts for friend requests from users they may not know.

    Stage Restrictions: Only age-assured adults may speak on stage in servers.


    I will definitely not identify myself for them with these options. If they would implement more private methods of age authentication, maybe I would consider it, since I am currently bound to discord for a few social activities.

    [–] iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world 34 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

    Well, the day it asks me for ID/face scan is the day I delete my account. Their days are numbered.

    [–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 6 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

    You think they'll let you access the account settings to delete the account without scanning your face first?

    [–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

    Just log in with a third party client where people in the Issues are complaining about being banned. Or use your Discord token and spam their API with illegal calls until they ban your account

    [–] TheUnsungRooster@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

    If they don't they would open the door to people committing spam or abuse intentionally to receive a suspension as the next best thing. I know I'll do it if they don't let me delete my account.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] deathbird@mander.xyz 22 points 20 hours ago

    It seems like the restriction should be lifted for accounts without verification after 5 years. After all, you're not even allowed to sign up if you're under 13, so by 5 years you have to be at least 18.

    [–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 44 points 23 hours ago

    I love how photo-based age verification scanning is the worst of both worlds - it destroys your anonymity, but not in a way that makes it easier to run a community where you can ban a person by their digital ID since they can just make a new one with the same face since facial recognition is too crude for that.

    [–] goatinspace@feddit.org 105 points 1 day ago
    [–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 95 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (20 children)

    Discord genuinely thinks they got the users by the balls... Thing is, people move platforms extremely easily. It happened to MSN Messenger, it happened to Skype, and it'll happen to Discord too.

    For those who are looking for something very similar, look at Stoat (formerly known as Revolt). Their URL is https://stoat.chat/.

    [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 85 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    One problem will be that there are way too goddamn many software projects that use Discord as a shitty replacement for a blog and documentation, and they’re gonna be a pain to move to proper content platforms.

    [–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

    Sometimes the only way thru is shitty. And those devs might have to learn the hard way not to overcentralize- or to not use a damn chat software for what is way more suited to forums.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    They absolutely have their users by the balls and I guarantee most people will continue to use the app after this, unfortunately.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] sheridan@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

    Mass migration like that occurs (from my memory at least) when the newer alternative has much better functionality, performance, and ease of use compared to the status quo service and has a low barrier to entry (sign up is quick and straightforward). Do any of the decentralized Discord alternatives fit these criteria (honest question, not rhetorical)?

    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (17 replies)
    [–] Aatube@thriv.social 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (7 children)

    only changes for the unverified:

    • Channels, servers, and commands set to age-restricted will be inaccessible
    • DM requests deemed "sensitive" will be inaccessible
    • "Sensitive content" will be blurred
    • Won't be able to become a speaker in "stage" channels, a special type where a few videoconferencers have a meeting where anyone else can watch and type but not videoconference; verified watchers can be invited to speak
    • DMs from unfamiliar users will be routed to a separate "warning"

    nothing else

    I think this is business as usual...

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] ech@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 day ago

    Didn't they just get busted for leaking their verification data that they totally weren't keeping?

    Guess I’m not using discord anymore lol

    [–] tabular@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

    I refuse to verify my age with a face scan or government ID for an online account/profile.. It's too easy to imagine how fucked up that will go.

    The more I delete profiles to platforms with ~~unwanted~~ disturbing features the more recluse I become. It must look to acquaintances that I don't care to speak (to them) but what can I do? I cannot imagine convincing even computer-literate friends to switch to something - as they will have the same problem.

    Do I need to retire my Discord gaming server before I'm locked out of controlling it?

    [–] jpablo68@infosec.pub 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

    You know what doesn't require full face scan? irc

    [–] whelk@retrolemmy.com 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

    I love IRC, just need some user friendly client recommendations if we want wider adoption by less tech savvy folks. Though I get the impression there are a good few IRC users who prefer how that filters out the "normies"

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

    Can someone help me figure out if matrix/element would work for what I need? So far it looks decent, but my main issue is figuring out integrations/bots.

    Is there a way to integrate something like PluralKit there?

    [–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

    Matrix does have a bot API, but there is not even close to as robust an ecosystem of bots to choose from. Whatever you want is probably possible, but depending on your needs you may have to write it yourself.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    "Content filtering" is just corporate jargon for subjective censorship, dynamically and discriminately restricting access to knowledge. I abhor all censorship.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] Dsklnsadog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Seriously, like, actually seriously, I want to believe that this time everyone will leave Discord, and not just a small group of weirdos like us who “care about privacy” and ended up on Lemmy.

    [–] fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    The reality is, is that we're going to be the only ones who care.

    Everyone didn't go from GMail to Proton or others. Everyone didn't go from Reddit to Lemmy. Everyone didn't go from Telegram to Signal. Everyone didn't go from Twitter to Mastodon (Bluesky I guess works?)

    This is going to be no different.

    [–] Cherry@piefed.social 2 points 11 hours ago

    I have felt like this for some years. Like I was fighting a tide and those around me called me crazy for my cautiousness.

    But more people are asking questions, more people are voicing they don’t like how things are turning. Not all are willing to take the leap …just yet but it’s a start.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Age assurance is the foundation of this new experience and is designed to respect Discord users’ privacy and choice. Discord users can choose to use facial age estimation or submit a form of identification to its vendor partners, with more options coming in the future. Additionally, Discord will implement its age inference model, a new system that runs in the background to help determine whether an account belongs to an adult, without always requiring users to verify their age. Some users may be asked to use multiple methods if more information is needed to assign an age group.

    Key privacy protections of Discord’s age-assurance approach include:

    • On-device processing: Video selfies for facial age estimation never leave a user’s device.
    • Quick deletion: Identity documents submitted to our vendor partners are deleted quickly— in most cases, immediately after age confirmation.
    • Straightforward verification: In most cases, users complete the process once and their Discord experience adapts to their verified age group. Users may be asked to use multiple methods only when more information is needed to assign an age group.
    • Private status: A user’s age verification status cannot be seen by other users. 

    After completing a chosen method, users will receive confirmation via a direct message from Discord’s official account. A user’s assigned age group can also be viewed at any time in “My Account” settings. Users can always go to “My Account” settings to appeal their assigned age group by retrying the process. Discord prompts users to age-assure only within Discord and currently does not send emails or text messages about its age assurance process or results.

    Not happy with the face-scanning either way. Gonna have a chat with some of my personal groups about how we might move forward.

    [–] towerful@programming.dev 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

    Discord is going to be the age-verification-service for gaming, if they can get laws to follow fast enough.
    They have the gaming community, they have chats/friends/DMs/VoIP.
    If they release a dev toolkit that implements in-game chat, in-game VoIP, friends list and age verification... All while not being tied to steam? Imagine if they offered a system for in-game purchases and gifting purchases to friends (oh yeh https://gam3s.gg/news/discord-adds-in-app-purchases-for-in-game-items/ )
    They are positioning themselves to offer a huge range of features, easy navigation of legal minefields, and no distribution-platform tie-in - while also offering out-of-game functionality of all of that (likely leading to player retention for games that leverage it properly).

    They are positioning themselves to be a market-leader/industry-standard for game social networks. Everyone that has ever used discord is the product they are selling, and they are now releasing the features and tools for companies to leverage that.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] EaterOfLentils@programming.dev 11 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (6 children)

    What alternative should we all switch to?

    Also thinking AI fake IDs will end up being an easy way around this.

    [–] TheUnsungRooster@sh.itjust.works 3 points 16 hours ago

    I hope people using fake IDs to bypass it becomes common knowledge. Felony or not it's effective and the ID verifying part isn't.

    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] brap@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

    Yeah that’s a hard no from me. Want me to prove my ID? I want you to prove that you’re not gonna store it. History suggests otherwise.

    Not that I want to use your platform anyway.

    load more comments
    view more: ‹ prev next ›