this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
1080 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81128 readers
4027 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Super Bowl ad for Ring security cameras boasting how the company can scan neighborhoods for missing dogs has prompted some customers to remove or even destroy their cameras.

Online, videos of people removing or destroying their Ring cameras have gone viral. One video posted by Seattle-based artist Maggie Butler shows her pulling off her porch-facing camera and flipping it the middle finger.

Butler explained that she originally bought the camera to protect against package thefts, but decided the pet-tracking system raised too many concerns about government access to data.

"They aren't just tracking lost dogs, they're tracking you and your neighbors," Butler said in the video that has more than 3.2 million views.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I chose Reolink. AFAICT it's not leaking anything outside my network and it's fairly inexpensive. Not as cheap as the subsidized Ring brand but hey, at least I own them.

[–] digger@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago

I've got a few Reolinks. I have them set to record to a local SD card and have blocked outside internet so that they're not phoning home.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)

the other day I heard someone make the point that Amazon is just a more successful Palinteer

load more comments (4 replies)

For anyone who has a Ring camera, wants to get rid of it, but still wants a doorbell camera for security/convenience reasons, I'll point out that Ecobee has a fairly good rating on Mozilla's Privacy Not Included page where they review products for their privacy.

E2EE transmission of video from the camera to your phone when streaming, on-device processing of video feeds, auto-deletes any cloud footage when people uninstall the app (so non-technical users who think uninstalling an app deletes their data will actually get that benefit), only saves clips when actual motion is detected, first line of their privacy policy is "Your personal information and data belong to you", and their subscription is 100% optional.

Only real privacy concern is that if you choose to integrate yours with Alexa, it might get some data from that, but that's optional. The main downside is just that they only have a wired option for outdoor setups, but they do have an indoor one that doesn't require any kind of hookup directly into wires in your wall.

As always though, if you have the technical ability to set something up yourself that runs only on your local network, do it.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It would be good if they had a way to limit range so it couldn't focus on anything that isn't within 10 ft of the door.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›