this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
294 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81177 readers
4454 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

"why haven't you thought of our bottom line?!?"

[–] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ooooo, someone's getting worried!

[–] Lazycog@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 hours ago

Was about to comment: it's afraid!

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What innovation, Google? Like threatening all Android devs?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Keep going, I'm almost there...

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I think that the monopoly can't talk about competitiveness after 1 year and a half they announced some anti-competitive moves they wanted to do;

Also, i find quite funny that google extensively uses open source projects and do the bare minimum to help those projects

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago

"It'll hurt our bottom line and make us less competitive" said google. "Aren't you afraid of missing out?"

FUCK OFF.

[–] mracton@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

Well since Google didn’t slam Europe, it’s not that big of a deal. /lh

[–] Kualdir@piefed.social 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely brilliant, the company that will be affected the most together with Microslop says its not a good idea to stop paying them

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Carthaginians furious Rome stopped paying them and instead invests in a fleet of their own.

[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Ya, let's support competition by sourcing from a monopoly...

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Get fucked, corporate shitpiles.

[–] howdy@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago

all my homies hate google

[–] Greddan@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

Damn. Google and everyone who works there are literal trash of no value.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

Oh no, anyways

[–] unnamed1@feddit.org 8 points 4 hours ago

It’s like there are three major political forces in the market: USA, China, Open Source. If we leave the dominant place for another IT world hurt competition? How exactly?

[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago

Boycott Google, check out the degoogle communities

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

Perhaps in specific scientific or engineering situations the "best digital tools" may be needed, but isn't that just a tiny fraction of the European userbase? How many office workers need bleeding edge tools to make a quarterly report or send an email?

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago

Plus, the whole point in shifting towards open source platforms (besides tech sovereignty) is boosting the development of open source software.

There's already open source scientific software. If it's not as feature rich as a proprietary one that costs thousands a year for one license, then all the more reason to encourage more contributions.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Oh no! Not the innovation! That is the only thing that matters to humanity, and we haven't got enough innovations already. When will Spoons 2.0 ever come out at this rate? I can barely taste my soup!

[–] rimu@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Thing is, what is 'best' depends on the criteria you apply. If one of them is "allows US govt snooping" or "allows US govt to cut you off whenever" then none of Google's stuff is 'the best'.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 1 points 2 hours ago

Kent Wanker.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›