this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
26 points (96.4% liked)

Canada

11588 readers
748 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. officials are threatening major changes to a trade agreement with Mexico and Canada that could upend the way business is done and leave Canada on the outs.

The Trump administration has a list of things it wants Mr. Carney to concede, including longstanding grievances about protected industries in Canada, such as the dairy sector. Another pressing issue for the U.S. administration is the fact that liquor distributors controlled by Ontario and other provincial governments in Canada pulled U.S. liquor off their shelves last year, in retaliation against Mr. Trump’s tariffs on Canada.

Trump administration officials have also been irked by Mr. Carney’s global charm offensive as he seeks to bolster Canada’s trade relationships with other countries, including China. Responding to a modest tariff deal that Mr. Carney struck during a visit to Beijing last month, Mr. Trump threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Canadian goods, and claimed that China would “take over” Canada and even ban hockey.

. . .

Mr. Trump and his advisers have indicated that the three-country pact could be scrapped altogether. Instead, the United States could end up with bilateral deals with Canada and Mexico, the advisers have suggested. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

MBFC
Archive

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 6 minutes ago

Ignoring these idiots and carrying on without them must be working. Make a pact with Mexico and revisit it when they bring in an administration that honors agreements that are more than 10 minutes old. At this point, agreeing to anything is pointless.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago

That would be a Mexican trade pact.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

So Canada's already had trade delegations in Mexico, very recently even, discussing 'things' with their partners. Both Mexico and Canada could easily read the room as soon as Trump was elected, that 'nafta' was toast -- and have likely got their own bilateral agreements shelf-ready for when Trump shits himself during trade negotiations later this year.

Trump throwing a pants-shitting hissy fit isn't a surprise to anyone. Nor is him responding with more threatening bullshit, when people are shying away from the US because of their threatening bullshit.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

I hate Trump for being American but he keeps winning with these trade deals.

He got us out from under the American thumb with NAFTA. If he can get us out if CUSMA then he'd be the best American president in my lifetime.

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 hours ago

Dude "wrote" a book on negotiations, but only knows how to play one tune.

And USA congress keeps trying to vote to end those tariffs on Canada.

If Carney's team is smart, by the time USA move on, we would have stronger ties with the rest of the world and business with USA would be optional.

[–] Aralakh@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Mr. Carney’s global charm offensive

What an odd way to describe diversifying trade.

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

I dunno, seems like a perfectly fine way to describe what he was doing. What's your issue with it?

He wasn't diversifying trade in his speech at Davos, even if that was ultimately his goal.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 20 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Agreements made with Trump are not worth the paper they’re written on.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 3 points 1 hour ago

Yep, why would anyone bother spending the time and effort to negotiate anything if the US will rip it up a few months later?

[–] Zaraki42@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's toilet paper. One ply.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago
[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

Oh no! Anyways….

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 26 points 5 hours ago

This is just an attempt to get Canada and Mexico to play lowest bidder.

Really transparent and weak move.

[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 hours ago

Coming soon: TACO night. Again.

[–] TheDoctorDonna@piefed.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

So a MexUSA trade pact, not a North American. I mean, he can call it whatever he wants I suppose, but it will still be what it is regardless of the name.

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago
[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 hours ago

Mr. Trump threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Canadian goods, and claimed that China would “take over” Canada and even ban hockey.

Since every accusation is typically a confession with Republicans, I wouldn’t be surprised if one of Trump’s next moves is to ban Canadian teams from playing in the States.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And he thinks Mexico is going to go on with a trade deal without Canada.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world -4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'd assume Mexico like us is fully dependent on the US for access to USD. All he needs to do is threaten tariffs, whose going to play chicken with their entire economy?

Not that anyones happy about it, its a sad reality. When the US did protectionism with the Smoot Hawley tariffs some say it caused a world war, as every country owes debt in USD and went into a debt crisis.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Oh well I guess we'd best all surrender then.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Ya that's pretty suicidal as a country, and all to protect a few monopolies that shouldn't exist.

Even if we did inevitably diversify away from the US, who takes 80% of our exports, its going to take a decade. Its not going to be pleasant.