this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
908 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

81621 readers
5129 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 52 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (11 children)

This feels like gorilla marketing to me. They knew the judge would tell them to take them off and it would be just enough of a sensational story to make it to press. Now more people know that Meta has these glasses.

Edit: I'm not changing it. The responses to my mistake are too funny

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 41 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

HA! yes. I knew I spelled it wrong just to lazy to edit my post - thanks!

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

I like it better your way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] narinciye@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 20 hours ago

Meta's glasses, retail for between $299 and $799, are equipped with a camera that can take photos and record video.

CBS is definitely involved in this gorilla scheme

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Gorilla marketing, when you charge at someone and stop right before you fuck them up and then offer to sell them something.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

I'm down for this, but not Meta shades. Professionals have standards.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Why would apes want Meta glasses?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 122 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] simulacra_procession@lemmy.today 35 points 22 hours ago

The return of the glassholes

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 33 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Step one being "make the judge mad" is a bad idea.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 26 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yea, he better watch out or he's gonna get a $6000 fine instead of $5000.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 27 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I always looked down on two party consent states, but now with the spyware glasses freaks? I'm less sure than ever.

I mean, I think I should be legally allowed to punch people in the face breaking the glasses just for wearing them, but this isn't a just world~

[–] v_krishna@lemmy.ml 16 points 22 hours ago

When google glass came out (2012 or 13) it was absolutely hilarious living in the bay and regularly riding muni (public bus) in the mission. I saw multiple people run into the door/poles/etc and also multiple people get their glasses ripped off their face and stomped on. Bus driver just shrugged, bus patrons applauded. I'm no luddite and all for technology but even more for consent.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 19 hours ago

These guys went full techbro.

Never go full techbro.

[–] mracton@piefed.social 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Get ‘em, Judge!

Eww. CBS is linking to Free Press articles. What next ABC News and Epoch News?!?

[–] iga_no_ika@sh.itjust.works 16 points 22 hours ago

For those who don’t know, Bari Weiss founded Free Press and is current editor-in-chief of CBS news.

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago
[–] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago

So I need to preemptively wear anti facial recognition makeup if ever called for jury duty. Gotcha.

It seems somewhat realistic to expect an actual punishment for this, even if not properly scaled. It's worth fighting for. But being prepared alongside that is important.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›