this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11785 readers
589 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For the 'Carney is basically just Poilievre' Crowd, a look at Poilievre's proposed legislation (note: this from about a month ago)

I've seen this take that Carney is just as bad as Poilievre more than a few times. And while Carney may not be as Green as some had hoped for but my goodness, the difference between him and Poilievre is staggering.

Figured it's worth posting the legislation that Poilievre put forward in August which includes removing pipeline regulations, scrapping the West Coast oil-tanker ban; killing the industrial carbon tax; eliminating the electric vehicle mandate and reversing the single-use plastics ban.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, we don't need to exaggerate, Carney's neoliberal austerity doesn't have to be fascism to be overall bad for us.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago

My problem is that poor governance from the lesser of two evils almost inevitably results in a swing towards the greater of two evils.

It just delays the worst, doesn't avert it.

We had other options, as uninspiring as they may have been. Now we're locked into a FPTP two-party death spiral, and both parties bear the responsibility for it; the cons for being unrepentant monsters, and the libs for pandering to the right and to capital at the expense of the best interests of the majority of the electorate when they could and should be choosing policy directions that don't perpetuate ballooning inequality and the decay of the social safety net.

Carney in particular watched (and to some extent, presided over) decades of just this kind of decline in the UK, he absolutely knows what his policy directives are going to do to this country.

[–] threeonefour@piefed.ca 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's honestly crazy that we saw the US do this literally months ago with Trump and Harris and somehow no lesson was learned.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The US did the exact opposite of this: rally behind ineffectual neoliberals who would not and could not get the job done.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

So far , Carney did nothing but incompetence and betrayed Canadian with the major promise of fighting Trump. This is so frustrating to me because the mini trump will win next time because of it