You mean Xitter doesn't hand over data without a warrant when it can harm their products?
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
I’m usually against complaints about poor headlines, but this one is completely factually incorrect? The FBI didn’t interact with Grok here literally at all? They issued a search warrant to X to get their logs?
I guess my brain equated from with X and reached the intended conclusion. I assumed that the title meant what you say the article is.
I’m not as quick as you. I got most of the way through article and was still wondering why X would expose a database of historical prompts to an llm for querying by law enforcement.
Yeah, there's no fucking way "Well Grok told me these are the prompts they used" would be admissible as evidence of any kind.
The earliest draft title seems to be "FBI Subpoenaed X To Get Grok Prompts Used To Create Nonconsensual Porn"
Which, in my opinion, is more technically correct (especially for a draft) but a whole lot harder to parse. They interacted with the Grok makers, which is kind of what I assumed
I think I like the draft headline better, despite it’s clunkiness.
I’m usually against complaints about poor headlines
Why are you against complaints? They are what most people who are super busy (voters) tend to only read. If they're bad or misleading, then most of our voters have bad information or are mislead.
People commenting after only reading the headline and not the article is exactly the behavior I find irritating and distasteful about headline-related complaints.
It is possible simply to ask a chatbot to reveal their prompt. And Grok isn't exactly one to push back on anything.
I mean, most llm makers work pretty hard to conceal the system prompt, and I have no idea why XAi would give Grok access to a database of historical prompts. LLMs don’t have memories by default, and their inability to learn from past experiences is kind of a big stumbling point for a lot of folks. You can ask, but I doubt you’re likely to get anything other than a confabulation.
What a terrible fucking headline. Even if they kept a record of every single interaction on hand for the chatbot to reference (which is preposterous), the notion that it could reiterate it verbatim to a degree that is sufficient to hold up as evidence of anything is ludicrous. It's also wildly inaccurate to the actual story. Bad job all around.
Seems like there were a lot more serious crimes in his list than the salacious one in the headline.
Probably because Trump wants to use them for himself.
To relive the "good ole days"
Sick fuck, would.
I'm no expert in adultery, but this sounds a lot like an affair gone awry.
She was "working out in his garage"? This doesn't excuse his behavior one bit. I'm just saying. Crazy situation all around.
Sounds like a grok user