this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
997 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

82261 readers
5094 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] projektilski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 hour ago

I want it banned regardless :D

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Shouldn't they want it banned because it already broke the law? How many lines have to be crossed before anyone does anything?

[–] BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca 1 points 31 minutes ago

I’m not clicking the link to read this but these sort of headlines are often a result of their survey intentionally wording things like this to spin the narrative. Anyone who does in fact want it banned immediately would still say yes to the question. I’d suspect there are many such folks across Europe.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 hour ago

i wish this was worldwide

[–] lithiumground@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I think all USA/Israel social media application must be banned.

[–] GameOverFlow@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What is a Israel sozial media application?

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 minutes ago

American ones it seems like. American politicians sure love Israel for some reason.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 19 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

100% of this European want X banned without further ado.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 2 points 2 hours ago

~~Yesterday~~the moment the sink carrying cancer walked in.

[–] CaptainRajah@feddit.uk -3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Just don't use it. It's that simple

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 minutes ago

I mean if they break the law there should be some consequences.

[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] sveltecider@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 hours ago

I want it banned here too.

[–] arch@programming.dev 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ditch it.It will have 0 to none effect of EU. And Mr.NaciSalute won't get broke.Mastodon is the way.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 5 points 3 hours ago

I think you are mistaken. It will have a huge positive impact on the EU.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

banning this website would be super good for Blue sky and mastodon

[–] sveltecider@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

lol people will go to meta threads first, not that.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 2 hours ago

One step at a time...

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 21 points 13 hours ago

i want it banned even if it doesnt

[–] Prikkeres@feddit.nl 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And ban Facebook too. It’s been breaking the law a lot longer!

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 2 points 3 hours ago

Just imagine how funny it would be if people would just ditch all that shit.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 hours ago

Those are rookie numbers.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

More than half are ok with any company breaking the law?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 2 hours ago

I imagine some of them are okay with fines, or strongly worded letters.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

According to a new YouGov survey, a vast majority of respondents in Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Poland (60-78%) think that the EU should take further action against X if it does not address breaches to European law brought forward by the Commission last year [1]. The majority of those (62%-73%) who wanted further action – and 47% of total participants – want X to be banned from the EU if it refuses to address these breaches [2]

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

20% being fine with it is still worrying to me.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

If we obstinantly refuse to call it anything else, then it as twitter shall forever remain

[–] Didntdoit71@feddit.online 13 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

I say that, in order to save the species, ban all social media, everywhere.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You might not realize it, but the Fediverse is social media so a ban would be rather detrimental to this place.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Damn near the entire internet is "social media" but people usually mean "social networking sites".

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago

but lemmy :(

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 141 points 1 day ago (14 children)

I think if any other (smaller) site were continually posting CSAM without moderation, it would be banned. What's different about X? The fact that Elon Musk runs it and he's in with a powerful dictator?

At some point you have to admit the CSAM is not the problem, it's the person running it, whether they have the power to stop you/fight back or not.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

not just banned, but there would be criminal charges brought on the owners.

Musk should be prosecuted for distribution of CSAM.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 20 points 19 hours ago

I don't like the idea of "banning" users from accessing a website. But I am certainly in favor of banning sovereign companies from doing business with the company that owns a website, and seizing any physical assets that the website company owns within the laws reach.

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Please put an X on X!

[–] DandomRude@piefed.social 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Yes, it is unfortunately becoming increasingly clear that even in the EU, billionaires and their companies are above the law. The legal situation should be clear here and there should be consequences - but there apparently aren't any.

Unfortunately, this applies not only to Twitter, but to most US tech giants in particular, to meta, for example. I have already stopped counting the massive violations of the GDPR that meta and others are constantly committing, because nothing happens anyway. If anything, the fines are so low that violating the law brings these companies far more revenue than it costs them.

So unfortunately, the same major issue that brought the US to the brink of a straight up dictatorship also applies in Europe: even the most blatant violations of the law have no serious consequences for the richest of the rich – and that is why billionaires are becoming more and more powerful.

The situation may be better in the EU for now than in the US, whose legal system obviously no longer even maintains the appearance of fairness, but even in the EU, the enforcement of the law is miles away from anything that could even remotely be called justice.

The reason seems to me to be the same as in the US: concentration of power in a tiny billionaire class that asserts its influence through corruption.

I think that if things continue like this, and I see no indicators that they will not, it will not be long before even the appearance of justice is abandoned in the EU as well.

Edit: Here is an example of how this is possible - it's just plain old corruption, but in the highest ranks of our institutions: From Meta to the EU Parliament: Former chief lobbyist negotiates data protection (German article)

Aura Salla was Meta's chief lobbyist in Brussels for many years. Her task: to convince politicians to weaken EU digital rules such as data protection in order to generate even higher profits with Facebook, WhatsApp, and other platforms.

load more comments
view more: next ›