this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
561 points (99.1% liked)

196

5822 readers
1603 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bigb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 4 hours ago

If these children were so innocent, why were they living in Iran? Checkmate.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago

This is some Naruto style ninja move.

"一千死の術!"

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I don't buy this at all. Why are missiles the same size as grenades/knives, why does he fly like a weird bird and if that child is on such a flammable box spring, why isn't it alight?

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 hours ago

Why are missiles the same size as grenades/knives

They're fun size.

why does he fly like a weird bird

He's emulating our great national symbol, the eagle.

if that child is on such a flammable box spring, why isn’t it alight?

If you look, this is moments before impact. The bed won't be on fire until the munitions actually hit the target.

[–] Toneswirly@beehaw.org 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

A "small" price to boost the DOW

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 3 points 1 hour ago

Yes.... boost... 👀

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 20 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 43 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Not a whoops. The girls school was specifically targeted by Israel as it is adjacent to a naval base and attended in great part by the children of naval officers.

The US military knows that targeting civilians, especially children, is not only bad optics, it also makes their jobs exponentially more difficult as they always depend on local support. The IDF's strategy is to inflict maximum pain in order to break the enemy. This is especially attractive when you cam make others (the US) do the killing for you and take the blame.

Normally, US intelligence selects and monitors the targets, but this shitshow of an administration has let a foreign entity (Israel) drive.

Regardless. The killing of those girls was not a whoops.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

The report I just read from NPR suggests this may have been a US strike based off of outdated targeting info. I will say that it’s just speculation from an academic, though. Time will tell.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago

And who supplied them with that outdated information? Could it be, could it be, could it possibly be Israel?🎶

Oh, NPR is saying as I type that the US also precisely bombed a clinic on the same side of the wall as the school, and "the Pentagon is investigating."

Too bad the Pentagon didn't do any fucking investigating BEFORE they started bombing.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 21 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The analysis I read (I need to dig up link but I think it was BBC) pointing to the link between the school and the base did note the report but also noted that it took them very little time to find out that it was a school and thatit had been for some time. Basically pointing to the excuse being VERY flimsy.

Personal Opinion: We will never know if this was a miatake or purposeful, but given Israel's deep involvement in the planning of this attack, and their recent choice of engagement (ie genocide), I am not very willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

EDIT: Not BBC. It was Al Jazeera.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/3/questions-over-minab-girls-school-strike-as-israel-us-deny-involvement

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I will say that it’s just speculation from an academic, though. Time will tell. You're literally describing the entirety of NPR.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

No, I’m describing the source NPR cites in the article

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, that applies to most militaries.

[–] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

This is essentially a “guns don’t kill people” argument.

However a particular gun might be involved in a lot more deaths if it happens to belong to a psycho who’s always waving it around at the slightest provocation.