this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
89 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

82427 readers
2888 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The publishers allege the shadow library is facilitating "staggering" levels of piracy. While the site's owners are not likely to put up a defense, the publishers' main goal appears to be to obtain an injunction that can apply further pressure on domain registrars and registries.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 minutes ago

Well, what now??

[–] Blueoaky@mander.xyz 15 points 2 hours ago

Elsevier? The company that makes money from public funded research? The one that does basically nothing and earns tons of money on the back of tax payers and free labor of authors, reviewers and editors.

Hopefully open access policies will bring an end to the exploitative business model of science "publisher".

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 56 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Cool. Now that the Tech companies have pilfered it they're going to shut it down. There are a ton of books on there that aren't even worth money anymore. They're out of print or 1-2 editions behind the scholarly current.

This is just bullshit

I got access to a bunch of pay-walled scholarly papers on Anna's

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Why aren't they suing AI then?

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

They are? The suits from major publishers were all over the news when they were started in early 2025.

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 26 points 3 hours ago

Because those companies can fight back, and besides, they went to college with the guys running them.

[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 12 points 3 hours ago

obtain an injunction that can apply further pressure on domain registrars and registries.

Fuck the DNS.

We can just have a public page that has their IP address and connect directly using that.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 18 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe they should try suing the businesses that actually have tons of venture capital money to take.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 2 points 1 hour ago

Why do that and risk actually losing, when you can go after the small guy and send a message to the plebs?

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 4 points 3 hours ago
  1. Go to Anna's Archive Wikipedia page
  2. Look at one of the 3 different urls published
[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 6 points 3 hours ago

If they have money to sue, they must not be hurting too badly from piracy.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 16 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

RIP to a real one. I read a lot of books because of Anna's.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You do realize that they don't actually know who runs the website, right? This is a lawsuit against a bunch of John Does. Nothing has changed, AA still exists, and likely will exist long after those lawyers doing the suing retire.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 16 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Prox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Great read. Thank you for sharing!

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

There are plenty of mirrors, they aren't going anywhere.