Now with its own dedicated hardware: the SPU (Slop Processing Unit)
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
360 points (97.1% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
38658 readers
4112 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Apparently you need a second RTX 5090 dedicated just to slopification duty
Looks like they trained their stuff on instagram posts tbh
Guess they didn't realize games have an art style.
Tampering with that by making all games look the same is destructive to the graphic art style.
Booo It's bad Boooooo
For realistic maybe but every style would need its own models and parameters to work well, seems like one thing more that will only fit for one flagship game and then realistically not used ever again
load more comments
(6 replies)
It is too... clean? The lighting is too "perfect". Each object is an idea rather than an image to be interpreted. It conforms to what instagram considers to be realistic.
This is a mirror of human delusion averaged and contorted to gaze into itself, and as such I abhor it.
This video has a neat showcase of what's going on here. So-called "AI" adds detail where there should be none, which makes the faces look like worn-out, but polished leather.
And I am fascinated by the number of people who, after all those years, still have no idea how DLSS and neural networks work.
Where can I post this ? Seriously I would love nvidia to see this.
I knew that nvidia will at some point make graphics fully ai generated, skipping the rendering.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Digital Foundry are gushing over how amazing this is. https://www.digitalfoundry.net/features/nvidias-new-dlss-5-brings-photo-realistic-lighting-to-rtx-50-series
Yeah sure it looks more "real" but you are losing so much expression and you are making the image look like it was badly photoshopped.
I think half of their comparison screenshots look flatout worse with DLSS 5
How is the removal of shadows considered to be better lighting in any way?
Yeah i was thinking that, using the comparison tool i was able to see it better and it completely ruined the atmosphere in the first image. The image without DLSS5 looks darker and personally i think it looks better like that, DLSS5 then just completely removes that darkness and makes it look awful.
Also, as someone who is making a game in godot, lighting is EVERYTHING, i am spending hours tweaking my lights so they look good.
It looks impressive and bad at the same time to me
Impressively bad.
Im a console player so the background in the Skyrim clip looked impressive to me, but everything else looked really weird and boring even though it 'technically' looked better to me
load more comments
(1 replies)
As an embedded systems engineer, I find VLSI shaders to be a fantastic technology.
Simultaneously, AI code overall is absolute fucking trash.
No thx. I’m not too big on the last few generations of gaming anyway but if they’re really going to push their slop like this I’m out fully.
I hate how bad NVIDIA has to be in general, because DLSS is legitimately amazing technology. Even the frame gen in DLSS 4 that was pretty rough at first is shockingly good in Borderlands 4 for example. Too bad they're the reason no one can buy RAM
Was watching the Digital Foundry review of this tech. They seemed impressed, the people in the comments were scathing
Everyday I think things can't get worse. That maybe this will be the breaking point. But no.
The main Resident Evil example is just awful. It's like an Instagram filter.
It's worse than that guy who has been going around photoshopping "Ugly" female game characters to make them look hotter.
I hate this reality.
Don't forget that when Sony went back and did the HD remaster, they actually remodeled her that way.
All of the worst people are winning.
Jesus Christ
load more comments
(1 replies)
How many R's in room since you've got a fancy nvidia card?
Also, twenty feathers and twenty pounds of bricks both weigh twenty pounds.
I would try to interpolate your probably real question here, too. And I'm no AI. Unless I missed your point
Someone posted yesterday with a question asked to AI.
What weighs more, 20 pounds of bricks or 20 feathers?
The useless chat bot will always answer with "they both weigh 20 pounds" because that's what the training data always says when asked about bricks and feathers.
That's what I said. I expect it to interpolate silly questions to a sensible meaning. Of course it would sound like you wanna compare a comparable set of data. I would, as said, also assume you meant 20 pounds of both and just forgot to say that. Maybe adding "take this question literally" helps?
No fan of AI here, but hate where hate is due 😁
They did ask it to consider and repeat the exact wording of the question, yes.
Hm, i just had to try myself with chatgpt, and:
so, as suspected, it just tries to ignore one's nonsensical questions unless asked to take it verbatim. This is actually not even dumb. If it had said "your question makes no sense", we would call it stupid to not see the obvious error in the question - as it's a run-of-the-mill-"riddle".
I'll have to find the post, but you did it in two steps, changed the units of mass, and object.
The post, which is extremely hard to find with the latest slop release from Nvidia, asked the chatbot to consider the exact wording, without babying it into the correct answer. All because the close variations of the phase "X pounds of bricks and X pounds of feathers weigh the exact same" have been used in various textbooks and such for at least the last hundred years or so.
That means that the chatbot has seen that exact combo of words, in roughly that order, quite a bit more than your use of "100 kilograms of rice". At least in English.
You can baby it through when the training data is sparse, but not when there are hundreds of uses of the same phrase over and over again in the training.
Well...I stand corrected.
Yup, it's actually an interesting demonstration of the power of training data on a chatbot, after all, they're just feeding it back to you.
True true. Always easy to forget how they actually work...
view more: next ›