Yeah, but they also added an AI feature that's enabled by default that I never asked for.
And I normally advocate for Firefox. It's been a good solid privacy focused browser for a while but now I'm starting to think maybe not as much.
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
387 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
82810 readers
4007 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Still better than the Chrome-alikes, but all the same I've switched to Librewolf. Problem is, foss mozilla teams like Librewolf are small and underfunded, and their ability to continue sanitizing and debloating the app forever is not garaunteed. A new vanguard FOSS browser project is needed, ideally one that continues the Netscape lineage of open and non-coercive web standards with a more durable and democratic organizational structure.
Absolutely
Ladybird alpha is schedueled for 2026. Hopefully that has a beneficial impact.
I don't trust mozilla though.
Interesting. I'd actually pay for an in browser VPN, it's handy to be able to switch countries on the fly. Ideally even per browser tab.
I would not however pay for Mozilla's mullvad thing. I don't like mullvad since they dropped port forwarding and OpenVPN. I use proton now for that. But in the browser is a different usecase for me.
It's just weird that it's not possible to pay for this but only for the thing I don't want.
I keep hearing about people dropping Mullvad for port forwarding...why do y'all need port forwarding while trying to stay anonymous?
Torrents, you can't peer with other people behind NAT.
load more comments
(3 replies)
The free option is limited to a certain amount of GB. Mozilla can upsell an unlimited version in the future. Likely the reason they don't do that right from the start, is that their VPN network is completely new and it's hard to judge the network capacity needed.
This announcement comes suspiciously close to the announcement of them including a lot more AI bullshit.
How far Firefox has fallen. This is really sad to see.
Just use Mullvad then instead of this roundabout way of using Mullvad.
ofc, this is a free alternative, not a mullvad competitor
"Just use Mullvad instead" is good advice compared to almost any other option.
Unfortunate that to get this experience in Firefox, we will have to disable a built-in feature and download some extension.
idk about you, but when I use a VPN I want all the device's traffic to go through it, not just the browser. So I'd always disable the built-in feature in that case.
This isn't using Mullvad.
Great… so now workplaces will have to default-block Firefox to lock down their networks.
Company managed settings
Yeah... #doubt