This is a dick move.
Next they’ll pretend to be an old lady and charge you with trespass or something?
Just not necessary at all.
What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Baseball
Basketball
Curling
Hockey
Soccer
💻 Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social / Culture
Rules
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
This is a dick move.
Next they’ll pretend to be an old lady and charge you with trespass or something?
Just not necessary at all.
Brilliant. Drivers on cell phones are dangerous, but very hard to catch. It's great to see them finding new ways to catch drivers at this, imho.
I think I prefer the Toronto (I think?) operation where they had a police officer on public transit looking out the window at drivers. I know it's illegal to use a cell phone at a red light but, realistically, it's not really that dangerous. But people texting when the car is in motion kill children (and cause lots of fender benders), so I'm in support of finding ways to catch texters who are doing so.
There must be other good ways, too: second story windows adjacent the street, maybe?
Kingston police started using drones to catch texto-drivers; but it got shut down by public opinion over privacy concerns.
Yeah, that makes sense. Drones can see things that a human can't reasonably, and they can store video footage indiscriminately. But I think it's totally fair for cops to ride the city bus to catch drivers out. Especially if they're in uniform. They can easily snap a picture or a 5-second video by hand.
I know it would still piss people off, but at that point why not just pay the those who are already manning the intersections? I wouldn't mind if they made extra cash finding those on their phones.