This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Oh no!
I hope all the details are shared so that we can all carefully avoid doing the same to those music industry bas...s-fishing executives.
when do the ai owners start paying the damages on stealing content to power the models? it's kinda the same..
The case against Smith highlights a growing problem for the music industry that had largely recovered from the Napster music piracy era of the early 2000s only to be faced with an AI-based threat to revenue from music streaming platforms such as Amazon Music, Apple Music, Spotify and YouTube Music.
This is supposed to make me feel sympathetic to the multi billion dollar corporations? Fuck all the way off with that shit.
The artists get essentially none of that money, so when they talk about the "music industry" they are talking about all the parasites feeding off them. Rob them for all they are worth.
"Due to lower than expected album sales, James Hetfield has had to settle for a solid gold swimming pool instead of the solid platinum pool he really wanted."
Money good. Napster bad.
The ONLY reason the industry cares is because of the fake streamers part of this. They not only welcome ai music, platforms like Spotify are creating ai music of their own so they can cut out the pittance they pay the artists.
This is not a goodguys-win story.
I feel like I'm missing something in this article. If he was taking the music but also faking the play counts with bots, how were other artists missing out?
The streaming service pays them out of a pool proportionally. So he basically diluted the distribution from that pool, resulting in lower payments to everyone else.
That would be the missing bit! Cheers
Got greedy
While not being rich enough to have fuck you money and get away with it.
Right. Should gone slower, more secure, settled for a million. Bird in the hand.
While I am not against AI as a tool, this person being a tool with AI generated slop remixes everywhere as a hustle is not approve.
