This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
I'm sure an AI babysitter won't be immediately and utterly broken and bypassed by every single kid in these "classes".
(Seriously: we're talking about 8-12 year olds here and the absolutely are smart enough and incentivized to break the ever-loving crap out of this stupid idea.)
Problem is that yes they will probably do that and get away with it and a bunch of kids get to have a bunch of fun .... learn very little other than how to cheat and get by and they get a passing grade and go through school learning nothing.
So they will run for office in Arizona.
To be fair, the kids smart enough to cheat it would have, most likely, learned nothing in regular school as well
Believe it or not if a teacher is effective people actually want to learn.
It doesn't matter how smart you (think you) are if you're not educated. It's possible to educate yourself, but unlikely for the vast majority of people. If you were a smart slacker, you wouldn't be one of those teaching yourself "boring" topics, whether that's trigonometry or history. You could barely motivate yourself to open your mouth while being spoon fed.
As students work through lessons on subjects like math, reading, and science, the AI system will analyze their responses, time spent on tasks, and even emotional cues to optimize the difficulty and presentation of content
This will be a nightmare for any neuro-divergent students, or really any student with atypical learning needs.
Theoretically, by analysing the exact needs, and being able to address them individually (in contrast to a teacher, who has limited time, and a whole class of students to attend to), it could do a better job. I mean the whole sales pitch of these systems is that they can attend to individual needs, and not just give you the material made for the average, "regular" student.
We'll see if it turns out that way. I have my doubts. It needs to have training data about neuro-divergent students, and knowledge how to handle them. And usually AI reproduces bias and stereotypes. Edge-cases are more rare in the training data, and that makes AI less knowledgeable. And that happens a lot. Plus current AI is very limited. I'm not sure if it's even smart enough to address individual needs. Or feed students with proper facts instead of fiction.
But I don't think analysing the students behaviour is the issue here. If at all, it's going to lead to improvements of those AI models, if they collect data about neuro-divergent people and feed them in.
Honestly the thing I'd be most worried about is that kids at that age are learning important social and language skills. Without an adult in the room to interact with, who are they going to learn that from?
Seriously. Teachers aren't just some machines spewing out lessons. They are meant to be a trusted adult in a kids life. Someone they can learn social norms from and someone they can go to if they need an adult they can trust that isn't their parents. I can foresee kids who go to this school having a much harder time getting away from abusive parents.
Yes, thank you. I feel like since the AI boom people have forgotten that the purpose of school isn't just to teach kids to regurgitate facts
I feel like it's even bigger than that. Since the AI boom it's become increasingly clear that our society has completely devalued humanity as a social concept. Companies acting like it's terrible to ever interact with another human. Schools acting like teaching is something to be automated. Dating apps trying to integrate AI to message people for you. Our society is going insane.
