this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
634 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

83040 readers
3945 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Land of the free? Freedom just keeps slipping away.....

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 35 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

What's the play here? Something isn't making sense.

With the Trump administration, the only thing you can be sure of is that the stated reason isn't the real reason. Somebody's got to be getting a payday from this.

[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 13 points 7 hours ago

It’s a money grab. About the only networking companies that build in the us are like Cisco and juniper. Which odds are, you aren’t running at home. This is without a doubt a money grab. Google and Amazon will gladly pay the exemption fee. Some others will as well. This isn’t about security or “pay American”. It’s a money grab.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 hours ago

Same play as always. Bullies countries and corps to get what he wants. As long as it serves him that's all he cares about.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 hours ago

There will be some meetings with oems, and gold things dropped on his desk, and the exceptions will start being handed out. Same as always.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

lmfao. apparently the way this was originally written would have prevented non-exempt routers from getting security updates. you know, the alleged reason this ruling even exists. somebody at the FCC office of engineering and technology must have noticed because they issued a temporary waiver (PDF file).

Applying the revised 47 CFR §§ 2.932(b) and 2.1043(b) to the newly added Covered Routers would have the effect of prohibiting permissive changes to Covered Routers even if they were authorized prior to the March 23, 2026, Covered List addition. This prohibition would be in effect even for Class I permissive changes—such as software and firmware security updates that mitigate harm to U.S. consumers—because previously-authorized Routers are now covered equipment. ............... Therefore, OET concludes that a limited waiver until March 1, 2027, is warranted and in the public interest. March 1, 2027, is convenient because it is the date until which the recent DoW determination excepts certain otherwise Covered Routers. Prior to March 1, 2027, the OET will re-evaluate whether to further extend applicability.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

From another article about this topic:

This leads to the question of what exactly the FCC means by consumer-grade routers.

In September 2024, NIST submitted proposals to strengthen the – undeniably modest – IT security of routers (NIST IR 8425A). It states: “Routers forward data packets, most commonly Internet Protocol (IP) packets, between networked systems.”

This encompasses a wide range of devices, from WLAN repeaters to smartphones

So new smartphones are banned too?

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

They wouldn't be forwarding packets between networked systems unless you're using one as a hotspot. And even then I don't know if the term "networked systems" would include a single computer or if they intend it to mean an area network of some kind.

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'll stick with my pfsense... Just rebuilt it yesterday to upgrade it a bit.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I upgraded mine last year. Went from a core 2 duo with 4gig of ram to a fifth generation I5 with 16 gig of ram. Installed pfblockerNG and now I don't need any other device to have a decent filter.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 36 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The next step is government approved routers with NSA backdoors.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 14 points 10 hours ago

Yep, marketed as very safe, meeting "standards" .

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t think there was a lot of research into where these things come from to begin with.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

What a surprise.

[–] Antaeus@lemmy.world 25 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Cisco is made in China. Ubiquiti, Vietnam or Thailand I think.

How is this going to work?

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 22 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

If we see a reversal of the policy soon then it was a standard playbook policy announcement to receive corrupt bribery money from some big manufacturers and importers. If we don't, it may very well have been with no takers anyway.

We've seen it plenty before (within the last year). Like tarrifs, then exclusions, etc.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Smuggling? Setting up a factory in Florida that reboxes routers and slaps "Made In America" stickers on them? Resale/referb router prices going through the roof?

Take your pick.

[–] Tarambor@lemmy.world 80 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

The only slight problem with this is that there are no routers made in the USA.

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 14 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Well, you can run your own router on your own hardware but other than that, agreed.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

Is that hardware also made in the US ><

[–] locahosr443@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

But where is that hardware made

[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

get iron from local mine and go make some relays

[–] locahosr443@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

But where were those tools made?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 4 points 10 hours ago

All it needs is a bribe from Cisco, and it's no problem anymore. Probably.

[–] excral@feddit.org 3 points 10 hours ago

New business venture: sell computers that totally aren't routers, pinky promise, but just randomly happen to run OpenWrt perfectly and have all the needed hardware.

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 31 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

You can install router software on any computer

https://opnsense.org/

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

On Linux you can just turn the kernel into a router with a few commands. Its actually very cool.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rezifon@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

It’s also true for every mainstream operating system.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

For anyone looking into this, I recommend picking up a “network appliance” PC. They’re low-spec, often fanless, and come with 4 Ethernet ports. You can often get them for roughly the same price as a router. You will need to provide your own WiFi AP with this method.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 6 hours ago

Hmmm... so if you install a router os on a pc that's made outside the US, will that make you a criminal?

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 23 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

All the thrift stores here throw them away. I've got dozens of them, variety of all types piled up in the closet because why the fuck the not? Fucking knew they'd come after them eventually.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

because why the fuck the not?

In theory, you would have better things to do with your real estate.

But I guess I'm the idiot who threw my kit out six months ago to make the house a little less cluttered.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

You need to start a museum lol

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 6 points 10 hours ago

If I were a network packet, I would get very confused by so much routing.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

So everything

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I think you guy are forgetting Occam Razor… the most likely scenario (least assumptions) here is that some inept appointee from the orange pedo thought this would be a good idea and pushed it with the research, planning and preparation we all put at farting after eating Taco Bell

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

There's a line about "... unless they have a waiver."

That's the razor, it's gatekeeping for who can get your special permit.

[–] hactar42@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I guarantee the routers your ISP wants you to rent from them will have that waiver.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago

Where's the Kalshi bet for that?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

designating all consumer routers manufactured outside the U.S. as a security risk

So this is horseshit, right?

First of all, ALL routers from ANY country are a security risk? Every single other nation is trying to make Spyware for the average American consumer? Doubt.

Second, they are extremely concerned with all consumers' security from foreign actors to the point it needs an outright ban on hardware to protect us. God forbid I buy an AVM router from Germany and open up my home networking to German Spies. What if they find out I sometimes visit porn websites and yourube!?

Third, that the US government, themselves, are trustworthy and wont force backdoors into systems to allow them unfettered access into private networks, something that they HAVE TRIED TO AND SUCCEEDED TO DO IN THE PAST. And also something that they are very clearly opening the door for with all of these legal pushes toward requiring age verification software and OS's. They want to ban foreign routers so that you have to buy routers from companies that they can control. They can ask, coerce and force them to give them access behind the scenes for some bullshit excuse ("protect the kiddies", "law enforcement", "national security", "terrorism"), force them to not tell the public, and then "secretly" monitor every device in the entire country. They are almost certainly already doing this with a significant number of US manufacturers and software developers.

Fuck these fascists.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 8 points 10 hours ago

I find it unlikely to be about security. Either it is about control or about money (pressure to induce bribery for lifting), or a combination of both.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It is entirely true that all models from all manufacturers are compromised by spy agencies. However the worst offender by far is Cisco even though they’re “American”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

Figures, make it difficult and expensive for consumers to get routers. Make it so people must pay 5 times as much for a lower quality "US made" router in 4-5 years once the factories are built; or people just stop using the internet at home like the administration wants.

The US does not make many electronics, and when we do, they are ALWAYS made with imported components. So this is once again a threat to companies to move production to the US, but with ZERO incentive for the companies to do so.

No wonder our economy is tanking so hard under these nazi's. They are so incompetent, it hurts.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 40 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

So at what point do they ban all new computers not made domestically?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›