this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25216 readers
1508 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 1 points 8 hours ago

I’ll say it again, it will never happen.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

California's move is the next salvo in what has become a nationwide tit-for-tat between Republican- and Democratic-led states in response to a plan to redraw the congressional lines in Texas to pad the GOP's majority in the U.S. House.

I swear reality reminds me of WKUK skits in all the worst ways recently....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oh8Geyc5VkQ

We can't fight by the rules, we can't go tit-for-tat, because that means they get to pick every battle, and they'll only pick the ones they have a realistic chance of winning.

We need to do the shit that if Republicans match it, we're still at an advantage.

[–] keyhoh@piefed.social -2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

While I love the idea of fighting back against Maga, won't this lead to voting being a waste of time in the long run? This just sounds like a new way to rig an election so that democracy is no longer practiced.

It'd be nice if there was a plan to reset the gerrymandering, or institute electoral reform, after this one time election so we can all experience democracy, as intended.

[–] rooster_butt@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

What I read before was that the plan was to have the rules to congressional map only active if it's to match another state in the union and it expires and has to be redone otherwise. I don't know the specifics.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Voting will still be necessary. Gerrymandering can't directly affect statewide races. But it can determine control of the House of Representatives and state legislatures.

The long term solution to gerrymandering has to happen at the federal level, but unfortunately the current Supreme Court is going out of its way to dismantle voting rights and protect Republican gerrymandering schemes. And congress isn't going to do anything to stop it while Republicans are in the majority... a majority that only exists because of gerrymandering and voter suppression.

I don't like it, but having partisan gerrymandering on both sides is better than doing nothing and letting Republicans cling to power because they get to play by a different set of rules.