not saying anyone should do it, but vigilante justice might be only way to get justice nowdays if megacorps are involved.
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
146 points (98.0% liked)
Technology
83040 readers
3885 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The price of doing business. Not even sanctions or protections were installed to prevent addictive doom scrolling and they get to keep doing this shit until they can lobby for complete control of internet
Any fine below 1 billion is a gigantic "fuck you" to the consumer
Woah! A whole 3 million??? From two companies with a profit of a medium sized country? Won't anyone think of the shareholders?!?!
Edit:changed company to country so I didn't look like an idiot
perhaps you meant "medium sized country"?
Yup, fuck, thanks, good looking out
That's like asking me to pay 3 cents...
That's like sentencing a murderer to pay $3 in restitution which he can and will appeal.
There will be additional proceedings to determine the amount of punitive damages to apply as well. So this probably isn't the entire judgement.
Whether it survived appeal to establish a precedent for other complaints is another story.
I thought the same thing for a moment, until I realized that's for one person. Now imagine a similar class action lawsuit. Of course it's not realistic to expect that dollar amount multiplied by that many people, but it could be a pretty significant dent.
yes.. yes it is realistic.
the precedent is set that it costs 3million per person..
these companies should get zero free passes. hit them with the only thing they care about..money. these companies, if law was actually useful, would have been shut down many manyany years ago, and CEO's would have been jailed by now. if the law actually mattered that is..
and CEO’s would have been jailed by now.
I'm going to move to Iceland.
The real takeaway here is not the dollar amount. It's that a jury finally recognized the mechanism: these platforms are designed to hijack attention, especially for young users, and that design choice has consequences. The 3M is a start. What matters is whether this changes how they engineer engagement or just becomes a cost of doing business.
I wasn't commenting on what should morally or legally be. I'm just saying that if there's, say, 1 million plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit it's not realistic to expect 3 million dollars (minus attorneys fees) in each person's bank account. That would be 3 trillion dollars, not including whatever punitive damages end up being. There's a practical issue to be considered.
the precedent is set that it costs 3million per person
Far from it actually. If anything appeals may pare down damages and nonpunitive damages must be backed by actual calculations. The bigger point I think is this sort of case can survive.
Did Zuckerbot throw it over his shoulder on the way out of the courtroom?
While he filmed it on his glassholes.
He had it brought in in pennies