this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
287 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

83126 readers
3704 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] webkitten@piefed.social 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Bitwarden’s Premium version now costs $20 per year,

This is what you're up in arms about? $1.50 a month?

[–] 0485919158191@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

It's not about the price itself. It's about the lack of transparency. Not being open with a 100% increase is not a good look.

[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago

I kept procrastinating on self hosting it, but now i will do it tonight and migrate to my own instance.

Problem solved.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 29 points 13 hours ago

Wish they handled it better, but I knew about this a while ago, and the price is more than reasonable.

A decade without a price hike is extremely generous, especially at how cheap their plan was.

They are a FOSS company that makes a fantastic product I've been happy with for years, I'll gladly pay less than $2 a month to support them. Their server code is licensed with the AGPL, the strongest copyleft license there is, which gives me a lot of confidence.

Worse case scenario, they enshitify down the road, we are protected via the open source implementations. We've seen this many times in the past, Red Hat > Alma & Rocky Linux, Citrix Xen Server > XCP-ng, Terraform > Open Tofu.

Pay for your open source software, folks 💖

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Im happy with EnPass.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Lawl I pay for the yearly thing and I’ve never used any paid features, I just wanted to support them. I’m okay with the price increase, but it definitely would have been nice to have an announcement maybe in December or spending the they’re planning that. I wonder if I’m grandfathered into the same price I’ve been paying? Ehhh too lazy to find out. I’ll pay 20, but yah some transparency or forewarning would have been nice for a lot of peeps.

[–] 0485919158191@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Sadly you're not grandfathered. You'll get a 25% discount for the first year if you're already a paying customer.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago

Ahhh that’s okay, thank you for the info!

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 26 points 21 hours ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Ransack3@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago

Wasn't this announced months ago? I know I heard something about it, probably on here even. Either way 20$ a year for Bitwarden is still well worth it.

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lendra@feddit.org -2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

20/year

How did you get two things wrong in a two part component?

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 1 points 12 hours ago
[–] kepix@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

free tier is totally fine for 99% of people. if i want a cloud, i pay for a cloud. hike was totally forseeable. its an ass move tho to birry info in a blogpost noone ever read.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

yeah i was like, shit 0 times 100 is 0, with a 0, carry the 0...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, not handled well. They're doing slimy corpo bullshit.

On the other hand, I like that they're open source and don't block stuff like vaultwarden.

I hope they can take the extra money and make the product better. Cuz I definitely don't love Bitwarden, but it's a better alternative than 1Password.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 136 points 1 day ago (42 children)

20$/year is still cheap compared to other password managers, but yeah, the lack of transparency is worrying.

load more comments (42 replies)
[–] quaff@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Lol for years I have been wanting to switch from KeePass to Bitwarden. Mainly cause the UX/UI felt nice to me.

My initial hesitance was that I didn't love the idea of my passwords being on someone else's servers. But I found out about Vaultwarden. So I kept my eye on it's development and longevity. Now that it's well established, I'd say I trust it now. Next I figured out a way to selfhost without exposing Vaultwarden to the public. Everything seems to be lined up for me to switch.

A few months ago, I decided it was time. After moving my passwords over and getting a flow working, I went to sort by most recent.... Oh wait. You can't sort by date. You can't sort lol I sat with this for a few hours and reverted back to my trusted and working KeePass flow.

EDIT: This is one of the most voted feature requests. Also, it's just table stakes! It's crazy they don't have this feature 😂

https://community.bitwarden.com/t/sorting-options-by-date-of-modification-addition-last-use-etc/2484

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shiftymccool@piefed.ca 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Get yourself a mini pc or old laptop and control your own future: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden

[–] guy@piefed.social 43 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Would love to selfhost. However, I have no trust in my skills to secure my device in the same manner as a provider, and I do not wish my database to be compromised.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TIL theres a paid version of Bitwarden.

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They put a couple things behind the paywall of US$19.80/y: the ability to securely share files instead of just text, and to host TOTP authentication. As it is I prefer using other services for sharing, and while TOTP auth is nice I'm happy with Aegis.

Edited to fix Bitwarden's price obscurity

[–] versionc@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Out of curiosity, what services do you use for sharing?

[–] alakey@piefed.social 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

While the increase is not a huge deal because the total is still cheaper than alternatives, the thing that irks me is how they did indeed just announce it via a blog post titled "Bitwarden launches enhanced premium plan: Complete online security for everyone". This reads like there's going to be free, premium and premium+ at best, and "we are just adding more stuff to the premium" at worst, not implying a price bump, at least to me. I did not get my renewal email yet, so can't confirm whether or not they don't even mention the annual price, but rather just the monthly one. Another thing that kind of bothers me is that they list "Vault health alerts" as a new thing, while it's always been there. While "Phishing blocker" just seems like a feature outside of the scope of a password manager.

All in all, double the price in exchange for x5 more storage and x2 more hardware keys is fine to me, but I hope they improve their communication and actually properly inform users of upcoming pricing changes.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›