this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
76 points (98.7% liked)

politics

25238 readers
2770 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] echo@lemmings.world 4 points 2 days ago

No doubt about it...

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I mean he is right

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

NO DISTRACTIONS WHERE ARE THE TRUMP/EPSTEIN FILES‽‽

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

We don't actually need the files to eject the occupant of the whitehouse from that residence. I mean, We The People are in charge. We just have to decide to do it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] iceagec0mmie@lemmy.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and he's a zionist shill that doesn't really have a position to stand on either. calling him progressive when he's a liberal zionist is absolutely batshit.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bernie, Jon Stewart and some other Jewish people condemned what's going on in Palestine and does not support killing kids. Can you back your story? Maybe there's something I don't know. Now most normal people of empathy does not support what Hamas did to innocent Jews, same as the zionist are doing to innocent Palestinians and West Bank on a greater scale as an excuse to sieze more land.

[–] iceagec0mmie@lemmy.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Starting on February 21st, 2025, he set off on the "Fighting Olligarchy Tour" with the other pathetic liberal zionist where he stated that Isntreal has a right to exist. He received criticism and yet still removed and silenced Pro-Palestinian protestors from his rallies. His exact statement from the rally:

“Israel, like any other country, has the right to defend itself from terrorism, but it does not have the right to wage all out war against the Palestinian people”

The only terrorists are the settlers occupying that land and for him to allude to Hamas being a terrorist organization is just more proof of his ignorance. An indigenous resistance group is NOT a terrorist when they're trying to liberate themselves from the terrorist settlers that are trying to genocide them.

Not only does he actively defend Isntreal's right to exist but he has also been called out for his voting record. Especially his vote to confirm Marco Rubio. As an indigenous person, that settler is nothing more than another pale face devil that pretends to act like some white savior when in fact the language he uses is actively causing harm to society.

[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If Israel doesn't have a right to exist what is the alternative in your opinion?

[–] iceagec0mmie@lemmy.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Eradicate its existence and give sovereignty back to the indigenous people of Palestine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Bernie Sanders bent the knee to the same oligarchs in 2016.

Every day he fails to support the creation of a leftist party he continues to be complicit.

[–] yonderbarn@lazysoci.al -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because look at the wins third parties have achieved...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bernie Sanders bent the knee to the same oligarchs in 2016.

Every day he fails to support the creation of a leftist party he continues to be complicit.

-SoftestSapphic

Explain

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I feel like I was pretty fucking clear.

He has spent too long with the DNC, he's been compromising so long he can't phathom any leftist policies or canidates actually passing, including himself in 2016.

He supports the dying ideology of Neoliberalism out of habit, and it's sad he's the moat famous progressive that is allowed to exist in this country.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (15 children)

The fuck are you talking about? Bernie lost the primary by millions of votes.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 2 days ago (11 children)

don’t forgot all the aipac bribes she took to look the over way as children were slaughtered.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah no shit

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That's funny, he also endorsed her candidacy.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (10 children)

The fuck else were his options?

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

I don't know, let's ask all his idiot fanboys that refused to vote.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was that or trump lmao.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

A bunch of his supporters seem to have wanted Trump then.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Huh, it's almost as if he understands compromise/tactics/political game theory instead of being a hopeless idealogue. Imagine that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

If Bernie didn’t do that it would have been a guarantee that Trump won. The DNC wasn’t going to run anyone else so that was the only thing he could do. I’m not saying I’d do it myself, personally, but I understand the position he found himself in.

As usual, nuance/context is a thing.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

. The DNC wasn’t going to run anyone else

The "DNC" doesn't run anyone, they support the Democratic candidate once chosen.

I respect Bernie. It's his right to run. When he's lost, he's always accepted it and endorsed the Democrat. He never claimed he was cheated or that the elections were rigged. He has integrity and understand that gradual improvement is better than straight regression.

Wish I could say the same for a chunk of his supporters though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The sky will be blue

can I have an article also?

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

The sky’s green, idiot. I shit myself. Can I be president now?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›