this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
157 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

83126 readers
3680 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] webkitten@piefed.social 14 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Anyone have any idea who the devs are? According to the owner tag in the code, it's: https://devfortyfive.com/ but there's no information on the people behind it.

Most transparent administration! /s

Yeah, having the real people behind it hidden is basically the norm for Trump admin.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 54 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's good information about how bad the app really is. People should not dismiss the information because of the crappy website complaints.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

It seems like it's only crappy on mobile, no isues on desktop here.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

same, worked fine in Firefox on linux, with no-script and uBlock

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Omg, another person who’s crazy enough to run noscript still, I thought I was the only one.

[–] pentastarm@piefed.ca 14 points 3 hours ago

I run no script on both Firefox desktop and mobile. I'd much rather have to approve things to run, than have them run by default.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What's wrong with no-script? I've been running it for years. It's a lifesaver.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If one has it set to default-deny Javascript, a lot of websites don't work, because many web developers don't develop websites that work without Javascript today.

Historically, websites did a better job of falling back.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

There's dozens of us. Works great on mobile with NoScript, although the source code snippets don't load. Since the article describes what they do anyway it's still readable without them, and the excellent performance is worth leaving JS blocked.

[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

I'm on my Pixel 9a and had zero problems with scrolling.

[–] jungle@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

It works perfectly on mobile (Pixel 7) for me.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 45 points 4 hours ago (9 children)

I can't say anything about the content of this blog. It was horribly laggy to scroll on mobile device. And by horribly laggy, I mean like aunt's 1986 vacation slide show on a projector while having dry cookies and tasteless off brand earl grey.

I'm sorry if it sounds rude but I had to bring this on out in the open. What even runs under the hood on that blog..

[–] XLE@piefed.social 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Even if the effect didn't lag, there's almost no added benefit to it. The title is cut off, and the description is even worse.

If the author wanted to, they could have done something like this with no scripts, minimum effort, and probably zero lag.

(If OP's website chucked for you, I'm curious whether this demo is seamlessly smooth. It is for me.)

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 minute ago

Smooth as cub's fur.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's a bit funny that it's completely at odds with how they describe their goals (emphasis mine):

I am thereallo, a web developer who makes things look pretty and work smoothly >w< been building stuff since 2020, mostly frontend but i can do fullstack too! i use react, next.js, and tailwind css because they just work, and motion for animations that don't feel plastic. i prototype in figma, steal components from shadcn/ui when i'm lazy, and deploy to vercel or cloudflare depending on the vibe~ i used to reverse engineer games (genshin leaks era lol) but now i just make websites that don't suck. i know typescript, python, go, and dabbled in rust and lua. my goal is making ui that feels human such as smooth feedback, clear buttons, keyboard accessible, no confusing bs. mobile first always! outside coding i listen to vocaloid and play project sekai, which definitely influences my color choices uwu. oh and i care way too much about bundle sizes and performance. currently learning native ios/android development. hmu on discord or github if u wanna chat! ♡

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I didn't have any problem on my Android phone

[–] nawa@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

It wasn't horribly laggy on my Pixel but it definitely was less performant than a page like this should be.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

Holy shit, i thought i was gonna have a seizure first time i scrolled

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

Worked fine for me, but I block ads and trackers on my home network so that probably helped.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 hours ago

Like its locked to 10fps

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 hours ago

runs perfectly fine on my laptop with firefox

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 3 points 3 hours ago

Yea for me too, it appears to be something we the title header following your scroll. It's super smooth just until it tries to pin it to the top.

Reader mode works until I realised that they did explain the pictures, so just referenced text I didn't see.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Not a performance problem. My guess is, they (poorly) emulate native scrolling via JS on mobile. Probably for some progress feature or something.

JS disabled, scrolling works. Though it was only slightly laggy for me.

[–] grinde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

Unfortunately all of the code blocks are loaded after-the-fact with JS for some asinine reason (highlighting I'd understand... but why the actual text?), so disabling JS also disables all the code snippets on the page.

[–] alakey@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

Definitely a performance problem, no HW acceleration on PC produces the same insanely stuttery scroll.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Btw, this site has no business doing (laggy) scrolling via JS on a fucking blog.
No JavaScript for you.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

AI vibe coded slop.

[–] Tharkys@lemmy.wtf 7 points 3 hours ago

Pretty much exactly what I expected.