this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

2368 readers
1136 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I did not know and now I am slightly angry at humans. Again.

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's what billionaires who are exploiting the planet and the people want you to believe. They want you to think you are the problem. But if that were true, you could also fix it. Can you? No. Can the billionaires? YES.

They are the fucking monsters! Leeching off of others and giving nothing back. Fucking parasites that need to die in order to save the planet. Humans can live in peace with nature and have been for eons, until capitalism took rise.

[–] Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You all are happy enough to pay for this to happen with your consumption of fish

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Food is not some luxury. People need to eat. If they don't eat fish they will eat something else.

You are implying that farming is more sustainable, but it's not. Over farming, over fishing, over anything is bad. And the only reason it happens is billionaire greed.

Stop blaming people who are barely making ends meet, living wage to wage and buying whatever food they can afford.

Most people can't afford to think about this kind of shit, but rich folk can.

Go kill a billionaire and make the world a better place for everyone.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Those billionaires didn’t portal into this world from another reality. Pick any human at random, make them a billionaire, chances are you have another worst-of-the-worst.

I’d guess fewer than 1/3 of people are “good” (even after being educated). The rest are just dangerously intelligent animals.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

and which group are you in?

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Nobody’s perfect, but if I had a billion dollars my sole preoccupation would be to spend it as fast and effectively as possible to help people in need. That one criterion alone — a kind of minimum requirement — unfortunately makes me weird. However, I stand by the claim that anyone who would do otherwise is a bad person.

To be clear, there is a wealth threshold (Maslow’s hierarchy of needs) that few people in the first world achieve, so we can hardly blame them for not donating their meager savings. But a billion dollars is utterly beyond the pale. Hence my example.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

We let the few dominate and exploit the many. Our relationship with nature is refelective of our relationship with ourself.

But the cultural focuson domination and exploitation is not biological. It's not in our nature. The potential to dominate is. But so is the potential of cooperation and mutual aid.

Let's try to rethink our society and behaviour to nature and each other and aim for the latter. For all our sake.

#GoogleBookchin

[–] ImInLoveWithLife@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Wrote this on my replacement cardboard desk topper at work a few months ago. Good stuff.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pls do not blame all of humanity for the actions of a few

[–] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

IDK the many allow the few to do what they want, if we all really tried we could have this over in a week. It doesn't even take everyone too, only like 3.5% of a population is required to overthrow a government.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I hate to break it to you, but nobody asked me what I wanted.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Defeating the government is the easy part. Building something new afterwards is where it gets difficult

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town -1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, cuz then we know how to kill you too.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

remember that guy who rams whalers with his ships front filled with concrete? he really wanted and he made a difference

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean like 95% of us eat fish so 95% of us are partially to blame

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The issue is not that humans eat fish. The issue is industrial fishing.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago

maybe this is included in your definition of industrial fishing, but i don't think i agree since the sheer amount of people to feed will lead to overfishing unless we all start indiscriminately eating any kind of fish so long as it's at all edible.

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you want to know more and increase that anger a notch, here's Ocean With David Attenborough showing the devastation of bottom trawling: https://youtu.be/IzG9AwlypaY

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago

Thank you, now I hate humans even more.

[–] pipi1234@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Slightly?

As the dominant species we should take better care of the world.

But, I guess shareholder value is more important.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you blaming me for this? I did not do this!

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If you eat fish that isn't line caught, you are supporting this in some form.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'll admit that I am not clean, but I'll also say that this is a consumerist framing which is benefitting might and machine. We are all sinners in one shape or another under the machine because we rely on the machine.

We live under planned economies governed by the eternal hunger of the machine. They sell us shit on stick through advertisements, media control and machine collaboration.

We loken these monstrocities through the dissolvement of the machine through making oppositional societies that by grounds embrace the meaningful, and being opposed to might and machine.

[–] Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

How about you just try to minimise the hold the machine has on you instead of ranting poetically? And don't start with the old 'no ethical consumption under capitalism' because you don't need to actively make the world a worse place by choosing the most destructive means of consumption available to you.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No it’s actually pretty easy to be vegetarian.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago

it's pretty easy to be *mostly vegetarian, being fully vegetarian is a lot harder for those who are used to eating meat.

It's an important distinction to make, we're not going to convince people by being perfectionists, we convince people by actually helping them change their habits.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago

I tried to go vegan once. Didnt go well. Probably easy for you, but I couldnt do it. Probably sais something about how pathetic I am as a human being.

Thanks, I feel like shit now.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How are farm fish caught? 🤔

Depends, but most fish farms heavily pollute the water and introduce diseases into the surrounding area.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 week ago

I guess I'm glad I'm allergic to fish.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago

Where is Saddam?

[–] Entropy_Pyre@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think that gives me more thalassophobia than any animal I could find in open ocean.

[–] hesh@quokk.au 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Imagine getting caught in it

No. I don't think I will.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is your daily reminder to carry a knife with you. Or a multitool, a Leatherman would do the trick.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

this is illegal in many countries, you're only allowed to carry a knife if you have a specific legitimate use for it, like "i'm on the way to pick mushrooms"

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah I don't live in those countries

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'll be 30 meters deep in a trawling net half a kilometer long, manoeuver my way past the piling realize to the outer boundary, reach into my pocket and start sawing my way through inch thick reinforced cord until I make a hole big enough to wriggle through and swim to safety!

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you are 30 meters deep in the open ocean without a diving suit, diving knife (presumably sharpened), and an oxygen tank, idk what to tell you — don't do that in the first place?

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I mean 30 meters laterally. End of net, 30 meters of fish & marine mammals & whatever else is caught in the net, me in the middle several meters from the edges, incoming tons of marine life to pack on top.

Honestly, having oxygen would make the terror of a prolonged death worse.

a Leatherman would do the trick

But enough about last night at the club!

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Fuck that sea life, the shareholders must see a return!! /s

[–] zqfm@mastodon.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@A404 As an American, I can't understand any of these measurements without Statues of Liberty, football fields, or hamburgers

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

The statue of liberty is is 93 meters tall. One kilometer is 1000 meters. This supertawler is 10 times the size of the statue of liberty

Yeah but we got the price of canned tuna way down!!! ~(until the inevitable scarcity and population decline hits)~

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Did they have to make the net bottle-nosed?