this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
497 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

84043 readers
8960 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 6 points 19 hours ago

Wrong. The glasses will misidentify in real time.

The goal is to "accidentally" arrest and deport US citizens.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Why bother they just target random people anyway. I have never seen any indication that their behaviour is in any way directed.

[–] ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The point is to absolve the human behind the arrest from responsibility. "The system" gets to do the decision making, then the human can't be responsible for making a mistake and arresting the wrong person.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

So we are doing “just following orders” again?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

More the corporate "this was an unforseeable error in the system" that absolves themselves of any responsibility.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

It was, in fact, foreseen.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 4 points 19 hours ago

The glasses don't have to work, they just need "plausible" excuses for picking up anyone who catches their fancy. $1,500 a head, be it man, child, or woman.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The American people should wear masks and sun glasses when out.

[–] wilt@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago

Head to toe body covering… wait…

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Isn't there some kind of weird reflective material that messes with it? Or is that just the stuff celebrities use so it crazily over excuses paparazzi pictures?

[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Everyone should start wearing clothing with known cartel member faces silk-screened on every inch.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago
[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You guys have to install using fake mustaches/nose/glasses thing as a new trend... idk how do you call this

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Groucho glasses.

[–] undrwater@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Will they care / understand about false positives?

Not likely.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 59 points 1 day ago

Feature, not bug.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 19 points 1 day ago (6 children)

As long as they kill p. of c., it'll be deemed legal 🫡🤢

Their "facial recognition" ends up just being a binary switch on a light detector

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] msage@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago

Always has been.

Cameras are THE tools for surveilance, and adding more everywhere has always had only one goal.

[–] mech@feddit.org 38 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It'll use AI and even if you have your passport and birth certificate on you, proving they're wrong, you'll be in El Salvador before you can plead your case.

i think that's already the case

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Targets for what???? Being brown? They need AI to confirm their racism? Was the old peter griffin white/not white chart not doing it for them anymore???

[–] other_cat@piefed.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

My thoughts were that now they can ID people tagged as "dissenters" to widen the net.

[–] Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You can't be called a racist if a machine decides it for you, same as if a drone does the killing, it mean you can't get convicted for murder even if you hit button to fire

/s

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 20 hours ago

If I point the gun, the gun evaluates the target, the gun automatically fires - then I'm not even doing anything!

(I should rewatch psycho-pass...)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Time to get your Insane Clown Posse makeup working.

[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was thinking more Jokerz, but honestly ICP is cool by me. Not really my thing, but they've always been anti-fash and after Violent J's daughter got into the furry fandom and formed an alliance, they're solid in my book.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

I think there was an article a while back about how juggalo makeup is actually very effective at blocking facial recognition

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Fucking magnets, how do they work?

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Notably the risks aren't simply that this will identify the undocumented its that it will provide a pretext to disappear almost anyone who isn't white.

The question is does any given non-white person look enough like one of over 10M people to get falsely flagged given agents a pretext to remove almost anyone they stop. Facial recognition of one person against a large enough database will almost always provide at least on possible match this is especially true if it matches against possible aliens and not against possibly aliens and citizens. EG a query of both will likely turn up Betty Sue Smith is herself and maybe a possible match with Known Deportable but a search against only aliens may return only Known Deportable with agents dismissing any claim by Betty that her ID must be fake.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it will provide a pretext to disappear almost anyone who isn't white.

Pretty sure you don't need a.i. glasses to figure out what colour someone is.

[–] Canigou@jlai.lu 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No but you can say "The AI told me to detain them" and not take any responsibility. "I was just answering orders" is sadly too common of an excuse in doing the worst possible things...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 5 points 1 day ago

Is this like how we planned to nuke the moon in the '50s to scare the Russians?

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everyone should be wearing a Luigi mask anyway.

Like in V for Vendetta, but Saint Luigi instead.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Look hard enough, or message the sellers and you can get Luigi.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Time to carry portable EMPs

… uhhh how do I make one?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

You don't need a portable EMP.

All you need is basic KN95 mask and a hoodie. Or you can invest in sunglasses or ID-blocking eyeglasses, like IDGuard from Zenni. The point is to have your features covered as much as is feasible. When I go to a protest I wear a costume that covers my whole head and a jumpsuit.

You should have a KN95 on anyway if you're going out among people.

[–] other_cat@piefed.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Suddenly reminded of an article I saw from like... TEN years ago talking about anti-surveillance makeup and haircuts. It was just like painting block shapes in multiple colors on your face haha.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (9 children)

You should know facial recognition software is optimized to defeat KN95 masks specifically

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

how convenient, the android zuckeborg has just deployed these glasses for those purposes.

load more comments
view more: next ›