this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
895 points (99.4% liked)

Fuck AI

6809 readers
3789 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Well these machines need to be maintained and repaired and produced.

[–] AvocadoSandwich@eviltoast.org 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Those sound like long term problems! We all know powerfull individuals (especially politicians) are incapable of thinking longterm.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

I need you all to understand that the petty squabbling of our politicians that relegates democratic governments to short term influence is specifically and directly because of the long term planning of the billionaire class!

[–] HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca 10 points 20 hours ago

good thing the wealthy and powerful only know how to vibe code

Hacking these things to decapitate a few lizard people would make for entertaining videos

[–] the_armchair_potato@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Sad thing is, most of us are so brainwashed into being cattle, it wouldn't make any difference. We have had the power for a very long time and very rarely use it 🙄

[–] sahin@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

We don't even know our neighbors. If we knew how united we are, we would have revolted already. They are making us distrust our neighbors, relatives, they are making us distrust the other gender, they are making us get seperated from our parents, by going to the university etc

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 19 hours ago

Our neighbours are who make us distrust our neighbours. There is no "us". Most people have at least one minority they would secretly love to see gone.

I'm convinced less people = better.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

We are out organized.

[–] StopTech@lemmy.today 4 points 19 hours ago

This is very true. And technology more generally is a means of power and thereby allows the few to control the many. Technology needs to remain local and of limited capabilities.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They're not much good if they can be defeated by stairs.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 17 hours ago

Or clothes with IR reflection, or makeup, or a a "good enough" picture

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Gonna be extremely funny when a transbian furry puppygirl polycule figures out how to hack the master control server and set their killbots to Eat The Rich mode.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (20 children)

We really do have to purge the wealthy to make a better world.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Cap on how much they can own and control. Say, $100 million? Tough cookies if you think you deserve more.

[–] Ophrys@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 21 hours ago

How about they can own their own head on their shoulders if they are lucky

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It absolutely staggers me that there are people out here trying to find out a way to make capitalism work. There is no "one neat trick". If you can accumulate wealth, then you accumulate power, and democracy under capitalism just puts the power of the state up for auction to the highest bidder.

Capitalism does not work. It can never work. It makes fascism inevitable. Capitalism needs to be completely left in the ashes of the past.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

There is one way how capitalism can work, and it did work for a while:

Worker action, from voting to unionisation, strikes up to revolution are all things that happen under the umbrella of capitalism, and as much as capitalists want to ban that, it's all just part of the same coin.

If capitalists play nice and fair, pay good wages and make sure the workers have a decent live, then the system is stable and as a reward they get stability to make business.

If they get too greedy and squeeze the workers too hard, workers push back. They form unions, vote left, start striking, and in the worst case they destroy equipment and start a revolution. This is the kind of power that the people have.

In theory.

Due to clever manipulaton, the capitalists managed to divide the working class and pit them against each other. This worked fine for a few decades, but it's wearing thin. It will take maybe 5-15 years until it all comes to a head and explodes.

And OP is right. Back in the day you had to get the military to shoot their own people. With automated weapon systems and AI/robots performing more and more of the productivity, this balance shifts rapidly, and it will likely lead to a total system breakdown with unforeseeable results.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

Due to clever manipulaton, the capitalists managed to divide the working class and pit them against each other. This worked fine for a few decades, but it’s wearing thin. It will take maybe 5-15 years until it all comes to a head and explodes.

Trump was successful in lying to industrial sector unionized that he'd bring back manufacturing to the US. His direct harm to that, and agricultural, sector shouldn't take that long to break the disillusionment. ie midterms. Q4 GDP, despite massive AI/datacenter investment cycle, grew at under 1%, with real economy contracting. The 45 year GOP plan of trickle down oligarchist/corporatist supremacism should be attacked more strongly for the lie that it is.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The Soviet Union as a counterweight was good for worker benefits as well. Keep the workers happy, keep the machine running.

Western Euro-Communism was seen as a real threat during the 1960s and 70s.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Totally this. The capitalists feared that yet another country could spiral into revolution and then communism, so they had to keep the workers happy.

The collapse of the Soviet Union combined with neoliberalism and globalism shifted the balance. Now they could always threaten their workers "If you are unhappy, we'll move production to Singapore or Vietnam. So behave if you want to have a job."

With AI and robots this shifts further. Let's see where this goes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Yeah, even the concept of money needs to be abandoned. We don't need it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] obvs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

$50 million.

If anyone is going to put money toward politics, it needs to either be not enough to affect outcomes significantly or it needs to be a large enough part of their wealth to hurt.

If you've ever wondered what billionaires spend money on, politicians.

They spend it on buying politicians.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and we are idly watching them do it 😂

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

hey now... we're also infighting /s

[–] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

bruh aint such a thing, every emp u could build at home would have a max range of a few meters tops, everything beyond that would need fision and or fusion elements, wich are not diy capable.

Besides that, its rather trivial to make robots EMP resistant by giving em a mesh or foil shell.

[–] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Aside from the joke, the reality is that the work required to get the wealth to the point where they have complete control will need to be done by human hands. Until they can have robots making robots making robots, they will require human labor which will require human cooperation.

Creating robots is no simple task and requires long supply chains that create a significant attack surface. Copper, steel, ceramics, ammo, batteries, computer chips, etc all have to come from somewhere. Power grid infrastructure becomes even more critical when robots are the only thing protecting you.

That's why I am less concerned that the Epstein class will be able to pull something like this off. Our current system is in active collapse, and their continued existence is predicated on the current system remaining in place.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm convinced this is also assholes like Elon selling the idea to them to scam other wealthy assholes out of money. Can't even get self-driving cars to work and you want an AI robo-dog with a gun keeping you safe? There's zero logic which would make that work, and yet...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Yeah, but it only takes one of these crazy things in the hands of a disgruntled employee to end a billionaire.

Might be the plumber. Might be the electrician. Maybe it's the seemingly friendly cable guy? Ah... Who knows. But that's all it takes.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Might be the plumber. Might be the electrician.

Once these clankers surpass a tipping point of competence billionaire early adopters will use them to replace everyone they can't trust.

Not saying they're gonna be invincible. But the longer we allow billionares to (exist) retain their hoards the better they will secure themselves against us poors.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›