this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
897 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck AI

7069 readers
2014 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Who do you think supports the giant supply chains to provide them with ammunition, energy, and maintenance?

Musk tried building a fully automated factory, didn't go so well.

Also, modern warfare is about asymmetry more than overwhelming power. You just need to spend mor efficiency than your opponent to overwhelm them with things like drones.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

So I see you've chosen Horizon as your future post-apocalyptic hellscape fantasy...

[–] Butterphinger@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

we're in the Megaman timeline.

Light up the Night

[–] xxam925@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think fitgirl will crack their security in like an hour.

I honestly think that robots or whatever are just going to be vulnerable. Everything has always gotten cracked… so I would be quite wary of deploying a robot army and relying on that. One day some 15 year old boops their bop and they turn right around and now you are in trouble.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This assumes that they have radios that can be exploited. Which is the whole point of developing an AI; to remove the necessity of human intervention and simultaneously eliminating the possibility of remote hacking.

Not saying it would be impossible; you'd just have to gain physical access to the robot somehow.

[–] AvocadoSandwich@eviltoast.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That would also require sufficient computing hardware to actually run those AIs. Otherwise you have already ran a circle around it before it decides to shoot in your general direction.

So maybe see this as a high stakes gaming computer delivery program :D

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (18 children)

Yeah and fpv drones flown by a human pilot can easily out perform "AI" so...

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On a 1:1 basis, maybe. You can expect to change as more flight data is pulled in. This type of very narrowly defined problem with enough training data is where AI becomes actually useful, as opposed to the online slop generators.

The other half of the AI vs human drone story is drone swarms. Even if the humans remain better pilots, there's always going to be a limit to how many drones a single person can fly, whereas AI can just keep scaling up the quantities.

AI is bullshit, but it's dangerous bullshit.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children)

Sure and there is always going to be a limit of how many drones are useful? Especially with the proliferation of airburst ~30mm guns mounted on helicopters and ground based vehicles? The Gepard ain't a new idea...

Pattern matching is a useful tool for war right up until the enemy evolves.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] sobchak@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Idk if that's true. I believe autonomous drones can now beat humans in FPV racing. Ukraine now has autonomous drones that can't be jammed and function under GPS denial, so they can go further than fiber optic tethered drones.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›