this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
614 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

84074 readers
4303 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It would be really nice too if they implemented Brave's fingerprint randomization, which is obviously not perfect and I'm never going to expect Tor like anonymity, but is far better than most other browsers. Where Mullvad and Tor try to make everyone look the same, Brave randomizes nearly every important fingerprint.

And I know Firefox does this pretty well already, but from the research I did, Brave's fingerprint vector randomization is another level.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

i noticed it allowed one to evade reddits fingerprinting filters temporarily. so it was useful for a month when i was using that browser.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 55 points 1 day ago (13 children)

As someone whose employer blocks the installation of browser extensions, I am more than excited to hear that!

Using the web sucks since that policy has been implemented a year or so ago.
Integrated adblock engine would rectify that again.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They didn't include this in the release notes? What in the world is going on?

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

From what I saw in a waterfox thread, it's not enabled, has no lists added or setup and is clearly early-stage.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's still a bit odd to deploy dormant code to non-testors, isn't it? Mozilla can withhold a Nightly or Beta feature for as long as it feels like, regardless of how many versions are released as they develop it.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I'm not in software development so don't have an opinion on the practice, just passing on what I read that seemed relevant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don’t think it’s as good as uBlock Origin.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 41 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's a re-implementation of the uBlock origin engine in a faster language, and it can be used with all the same lists as uBlock origin. The only thing missing is a decent user interface, and even if Firefox isn't committed to providing one, WaterFox is.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago

Source on this? Are you saying brave's adblock is reimplementation of ublock. I have never heard of that. Maybe inspiration?

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 day ago

Good to hear, actually something worthwhile from FF (rust?) rather than AI crap. Hope it gets to Zen soon (and i can trust it as much as uBlock).

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is there a risk of negative conflicts if you also have uBO? Like having two antivirus apps being counterproductive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fernandofig@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

it can be used with all the same lists as uBlock origin

Can it really? I mean, you already mentioned there's "no decent UI", which I take it to mean there's no way to customize the lists in Firefox, but can it be customized in Brave? Also, can it handle the blocking of Youtube Ads as effectively as uBO does?

It's been ages since I've last tried Brave, so I really want to know. I may actually try and use it as backup chromium-based browser if that's the case.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's been ages since I've last tried Brave, so I really want to know. I may actually try and use it as backup chromium-based browser if that's the case

It's good if you don't mind the CEO being an evil idiot, he is anti-lgbtq+

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alakey@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago

That's why it's been "quietly added", it's not ready for use. You can add lists in about:config, but this is just a super early implementation.

Yes, you can adjust filter lists in Brave, including custom ones.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kepix@lemmy.world -5 points 14 hours ago

too little, too late

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›