this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
171 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

84171 readers
4119 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The biometric ID project has been halted and investigated in multiple countries, but it recently partnered with Tinder, Zoom, and Docusign to verify users.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 hour ago

The US can do whatever they want in their country but leave the rest of us alone. We're actually doing much better without you. It would be even better if you stopped interfering ie start an illegal war, in the name of Israel. Than we can all move on without the US.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 3 hours ago

An MIT Technology Review investigation reveals World’s unethical practices when onboarding test users across Africa and Asia, including deceptive marketing practices. The investigation also says that World was gathering personal data beyond iris scans, including heartbeat, breathing, and other vital signs, and doing so without obtaining meaningful informed consent.

Insane. When businesses are building massive systems to identify and track the citizenry, the government should step in and stomp it out. Instead, the government is mandating that it proceeds.

The system is functioning as expected. The system must be destroyed.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 89 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm not doing that. Go fuck yourselves.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 33 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is companies like docusign you might not have a choice not to use it, for a job for instance. This is pernicious, and will force us to hand over even more of our information, accepting a thousand page terms of service to do necessary tasks, with no government protection (none enforced even when there,) to any significant degree.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

In sane places, large terms of service are unenforceable due to the lack of reasonable expectation that they were read and understood. The USA is just a dystopic cesspool of anti-consumerism.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Most of such terms were unenforceable in the US too, until around 2001 or so, and it just got worse from there. The supreme court made it official in the 10's sometime if I recall, endorsing even making consumers or employees sign away their rights to sue to either buy something or get hired.

All that wage theft from minimum wage workers, which exploded in the bush years, happened with employees unable to sue, instead only being able to bring a binding arbitration suit of the employer's choosing. And knowing them they would make the claimant pay a big filing fee to start the process.

It also used to be that if one part of such a contract was found to be illegal, the entire thing would be thrown out, not any more.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That last part isn't necessarily bad. There could be an honest mistake in a contract both parties are otherwise fine with. As for the rest... I'm so glad I emigrated.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The last part is always bad, even if theoretically it may not be. When you have a hundred to a thousand terms and conditions being pushed on you for a near immediate signature, that's because they can add that one part being illegal doesn't make the rest unenforceable, and now instead of a single page of terms we have a hundred.

There is a reason the Courts made that rule of disqualifying the entire contract of such contracts if one part was illegal, and they have rules and tests for when that applies too in such cases to prevent any legitimate mistakes from cancelling an entire contract.

[–] kaiyo@piefed.ca 11 points 3 hours ago

From the country so adament against a nationwide ID, this is rich

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

US: Are we the bad guys?

Morgan Freeman: It was at that moment that the people realized they were.

[–] SaintNectar@lemmy.zip 0 points 47 minutes ago (1 children)

Oh god.. They really want to track every humans on this planet. And we all know for what purposes

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 4 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

They already do. They just want to make it easier

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 37 minutes ago

And also have the ability to turn off people's legal existence when they get up to too much anti-corporate shenanigans.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 40 points 5 hours ago

Fuck off, Sam

[–] br0da@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

Again, we don’t have to use any of this. There are alternatives to all of those products.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Hold up? I'm going to need to verify to use zoom, now? Wtf for?

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

So they can have more valuable , more personal data.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Wake up and smell the dystopia. It's cooking, and if you don't like how it smells, just wait until you have to eat it.

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Uhm, no.

This is one of those technologies that CEOs hear about and think would be great for their business. But, they don’t consider that nobody wants to fucking do this.

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

they don't care... big difference.

[–] Lanske@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

/ sarcasm on All companies who respect your privacy / sarcasm off