this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
220 points (97.8% liked)

politics

25872 readers
3481 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 97 points 5 days ago (3 children)

"The full extent of the charges being prepared against Comey is unclear, but the sources believe that at least one element of the indictment — if it goes forward -- will accuse him of lying to Congress during his testimony on September 30, 2020 about whether he authorized a leak of information," Dilanian tweeted.

The reporter noted that the five-year statute of limitations on that charge would lapse next Tuesday.

lol

What a disgusting joke this administration has made everything.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 33 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I know these particular charges are probably bullshit, but I don't think there should be a statute of limitations for lying to Congress.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Five years seems to be plenty of time to fact-check someone's testimony. Anything longer than that, and most people simply won't recall their own words well enough to hold them accountable for them anymore.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The problem is that the DOJ isn't as independent as people would like it to be, so you basically need a change in administration to hold someone to account, which could take longer than 5 years.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 3 points 5 days ago

Congress has cameras. If you're lying to Congress about factual things, your memory of the event shouldn't matter.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

They're bullshit enough that the previous AG refused to prosecute and got fired for it.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

He's really doing a good job of QA testing of USA v1. We'll know what to patch in v2.

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Don't know about the US, but in most european places the statute of limitations limits when something can start being prosecuted - i.e., if you were indicted a minute before the statute is up, and the process takes years to complete, it doesn't prevent the process from continuing.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Same here - they just have five days for this new head of the 300-person prosecutor's office who handles a lot of government cases to create an illegal false prosecution scheme against the former head of the FBI and have their slip-and-fall-lawyer director get it in front of a judge and convince them it's really important to do this in the equivalent of the next few minutes because Predisent Demented Rapist Babyhands is gonna cry.

Technically possible. Practically - less so.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 80 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I really dislike this meme that everything is a distraction from Epstein. Distractions are something you're supposed to ignore. This is a president engaging in politically-motivated prosecutions of his political rivals. Calling it a distraction is dangerous and unhelpful.

[–] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'd take it a step further and say the Epstein files themselves are the distraction from all the brazen corrupt power grabbing Republicans are pulling right now. What would the release of the full, unredacted files even accomplish at this point? Sane people will feel even more justified in their hate of the admin, and the cultists will write it off as fake news. There is zero chance Congress impeaches and convicts, even if it comes out Trump was spending his time on the island literally sacrificing children to Satan.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If releasing the files wasn't likely to have an impact, they'd have been released by now.

For even some of the most diehard MAGA folks, diddling kids is a step too far.

Of course there's a likelihood that the sheer number of folks involved would mean a huge amount of current and prominent politicians would have to go and that would almost certainly amount to what could best be described as a "reset" of the current political system and, well, maybe that's the real reason they haven't been released because neither side wants that, even though it's painfully obvious that the system is broken and needs it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I agree apart from it being something that could absolutely destroy his freedom. This issue is getting buried because it is clearly something they know is a public fulcrum. So while they can and should be doing other things in parallel, this singular thing that they claimed would be a priority upon capturing the presidency obviously threatens the entire administration and beyond. It’s more important than most things the keep throwing out there.

Comey can get fucked, and so can everyone who was involved in pedo island.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I agree apart from it being something that could absolutely destroy his freedom. This issue is getting buried because it is clearly something they know is a public fulcrum. So while they can and should be doing other things in parallel, this singular thing that they claimed would be a priority upon capturing the presidency obviously threatens the entire administration and beyond. It’s more important than most things the keep throwing out there.

Comey can get fucked, and so can everyone who was involved in pedo island. It’s just a friendly reminder that our commander in chief is doing everything that a guilty person would do in his position.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 41 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Oh boy I’m positive that this will fix the economy and cause the price of groceries, gas, and housing to drop. So much winning!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Ohhhhh yeah. A bunch of people did temporarily believe that shit.

Morans.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Oh didn't you hear? Trump said the price of gas was below $2.00/gal. You should look at the gas pump more closely next time.

I'm sure he'll bring it down even further, maybe 1200% like drug prices.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 42 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I thought Grand Jury proceedings were supposed to be secret? Why are they leaking this now?

I bet they are afraid that the Grand Jury will refuse to indict, and they are trying to build up outrage among the MAGAs when that happens

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Grand juries are only needed on certain levels of charges, like a felony. Lower-level infractions do not need a grand jury indictment.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

I'm still more than a little annoyed at Comey for handing Taco a "win" back in 2016, but this is some bullshit here.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

“But the sources believe that at least one element of the indictment — if it goes forward — will accuse him of lying to Congress during his testimony on September 30, 2020 about whether he authorized a leak of information,” Dilanian tweeted.

I wonder if there's evidence Kash Patel lied to congress and if he'll be charged too

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

Trumps first AG explicitly lied to Congress and - bupkis.

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 days ago

It could not have happened to a better person. Comey is a pro-surveillance fascist who is now getting a taste of his own medicine.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I've never understood why Trump hates Comey when he owes his presidency to the man.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Trumps is a spoiled child with no impulse control, no forethought, and no empathy.

He wants everyone to obey him, right now, with no exception.

Comey must have broke one of those rules.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Because Trump is loyal to no one and never pays his debts.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Worse than a Lannister.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

He resents anyone who's ever held power over him, even if they did go his way.

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

so much for helping trump get elected the first time

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Everyone Who Supports Trump Will Be Shit On.

No Exceptions

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Orange Jesus needs to conduct some good ol' struggle sessions in which people deemed insufficiently "maga" (nonsense baby-talk word meaning: properly sucking up to this demented old geezer) need to really sit and reflect - with lots of Party apparatchiks castigating them - on just why they are not sufficiently "maga".

I mean, hell, Taco has already appropriated many of the shittiest of ideas from craptacular regimes like USSR...he's got his own Lysenkoists like RFK junior...

[–] Auk@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Comey deserves the hassle. He helped put Trump in the WH. Reap what you sow.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 36 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No, he doesn’t deserve to be brought in on trumped up charges because he had bad judgement as the FBI director.

If what he did as FBI director was illegal in some way, sure, charge him. But, we know this is just some bullshit political game the president is playing to silence his critics and it has very bad implications for the country.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 16 points 5 days ago

If bad judgement as FBI director gets prison time, Kash Patel has an interesting future.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

We don't deserve the injustice, but Comey helped bring it upon us and is reaping what he sowed.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There was a really interesting part of that story where supposedly Rudy Giuliani who was all buddy buddy with the SDNY FBI office somehow "leaked" that they were going to announce the Clinton email case would be reopened when in fact they weren't because they knew there was no reason to, and Comey decided he couldn't be upstaged by SDNY so he did it first.

True? Dunno. Plausible? yeah.

load more comments (1 replies)

Comey is the guy that helped get Trump in office

Bet a Grand Jury won't let this through. Fuck Trump and his cronies. Anyone who gets selected for an indictment panel should automatically shoot it down if it's coming from these clowns.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

“Mr. Comey and Mr. McCabe’s statements are irreconcilably contradictory,” Cruz wrote. “Mr. McCabe says that he told Mr. Comey of the leak and that Mr. Comey approved — effectively authorizing the leak after the fact."

This statement itself is "irreconcilably contradictory". Did he "authorize" the leak before or after it occurred? Cruz seems to be implying that he found out after, but approved. Which means he didn't know before hand, and therefore couldn't have actually authorized it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›