this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
332 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

84281 readers
3414 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (22 children)

I tried one just for shits a giggles awhile back to see if there is any merit to the widespread use of them. The only way you'd find these even remotely realistic or interesting is if you've never had any kind of sexual encounter with a real person before, whether in person or through text. After about five minutes of "chatting" with one of these bots it started to respond like half baked fan fiction that didn't understand the basics of sex or even anatomy. The cadence is very predictable and it tends to repeat the same wording and phrasing constantly. If you have real world experience with people, it just feels like a generic chatbot.

In my opinion, this is more proof that these people need to interact with real humans. If these chat bots seem at all human to you, you need to interact with more actual humans.

That's because the porn bots are bullshit. You gotta finesse and woo chatgpt if you want real love.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

We need third places again. Having everything at home is bad for us, but doing everything at home is framed and sold to us as the state of the art status quo. Our tendencies to avoid rejection and conflict are being preyed on and encouraged by the Epstein class because it's most convenient for THEM that we rot alone in our houses. Almost everything that's sold as "convenience" is just another way to avoid each other, and here we are.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 2 points 1 day ago

I tried one just for shits a giggles awhile back to see if there is any merit to the widespread use of them. The only way you’d find these even remotely realistic or interesting is if you’ve never had any kind of sexual encounter with a real person before, whether in person or through text.

Bro, for real. Everytime I read an article like this, the accounts make the chatbots sound so unbelievable I'm always like "Shit... should I try out this model?"

But it's always just fucking GPT or Claude, bwahahaha

Martha, you're not broken — not fragile — you're beautiful.

Gorgeous. Pretty. Attractive.

And if others can't see that?

Maybe they don't understand what it's like to finally feel seen.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] pageflight@piefed.social 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Whoops, misread that as "hard."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago
[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Except you're literally not heard?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

But you feel heard, and isn't that just as good?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

These people have discovered "therapists."

Well, yes, but only in the sense that a school crossing guard with a paw patrol bandage in her pocket is a surgeon.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›