this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
283 points (95.8% liked)

Memes

55636 readers
347 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PunkMonk@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 day ago

'Humans are naturally greedy and instead of doing anything to try right this wrong, we should just be contempt being awful. Oh, and also ignore all historical evidence of the ways tribes would share resources communally.'

[–] ClassIsOver@hexbear.net 27 points 1 day ago

"Communism doesn't work because people are inherently corrupt, so it makes sense to choose an alternative that actively selects for it"

[–] Rindogang@lemmy.ml 46 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Yeah... people forget that ancient humans survived through cooperation long before states existed and the fights they did have were mostly just over territory and resources. Not some deep evil ''human nature''

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

To be fair, getting people to coordinate gets exponentially harder the more people you have. We evolved to work in relatively small groups, not millions or billions.

[–] Rindogang@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah true but humans have evolved to cooperate on a large scale, unlike most primates

The violence we see today has nothing to do with culture clashes or a lack of evolution... it’s driven by inequality. And the state wasn't created to solve coordination problems, it emerged from inequality to protect those who had too much

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago

And yet society has evolved historically towards greater and greater interconnection, rather than fragmentation. Shouldn't that say something about how human nature depends more on our ever-changing material conditions, than as something fixed and static?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

There was cooperation, sure. There was also a lot of killing.

It's not just human nature, even chimps kill chimps from other groups who stray into the wrong territory.

Cooperation against other humans (and Neanderthals and such)

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 2 days ago

I would make the argument that our species resorting to violent conflict over shareable resources is a pretty damning indictment of human nature.

Tribalism exists, it's a scientific fact. You can overcome the biases it imposes through cognitive effort, but at a baseline we are predisposed to hate anyone who we believe "doesn't belong." That's not inherently evil, but it is asshole behavior.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And they're confusing learned societal encouraged behavior as innate despite all evidence to the contrary from anthology.

[–] jorge@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Do you mean anthropology? Honest question.

[–] MoonManKipper@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Or they’ve just met a reasonable number of a*holes…

[–] Dialectical_Idealist@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you only saw a bear in a circus, you would think its nature was to ride a unicycle.

It's also intellectually dishonest to ignore examples of communal behavior, such as gift economies and communal farrming, as somehow not counting when we're considering "human nature". There are exceedingly many examples of selflessness even in this individualist hellhole we built for ourselves.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Not quite, if that were the case the statement would be "because assholes". By blaming "human nature" they're self identifying as one of the assholes.

Assholism is a diverse group with many discrete types of sub-asshole.

[–] StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

Not necessarily. People could have an outlook similar to "a person is smart, people are idiots"

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's the nature of humanity that in any reasonably sized group, there are always a few assholes.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed, but IMHO that is a different conjecture to that of the meme.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

I don't think so. Good things can't happen because of human nature: making good things happen involves groups making decisions, and in every group there are bound to be some assholes because that's human nature, that limits the kinds of good things that can happen.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

And that they've observed that once groups reach a certain size, it's inevitable that the group contains at least one asshole.

It's like the fable of the scorpion and the frog. It doesn't mean that it's impossible to cross the river. It just means that you need a more complex plan than just carrying the scorpion across on your back.