isn't 4d a line of cubes? would need 6d for cubes of cubes?
this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
787 points (99.1% liked)
People Twitter
10247 readers
157 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I can do my job that pays more than that and I can't do this problem lol. ๐
Well technically as the ant is traveling across the fourth dimension, time in most cases, in the example meaning it instantaneously travels the entire surface and touches the faces an infinite number of times in an infinite path unless only one edge touches a surface without any 3 dimensional velocity. If the latter, then let us define the faces along said edge as 1 and 4, the faces between but parallel in edges as 2 and 3, and the faces on the perpendicular axis as 5 and 6. Then, its path is 1, 5, 2, 6, 3, 4, and dismount. To ensure the ant never again approaches the cube in infinite time, have it travel in a perfect circle around the cube infinitely.
load more comments
(6 replies)