this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
822 points (99.3% liked)

Selfhosted

56958 readers
1034 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the latest episode of "they will always sell you out" - they sold you out! Who would've thought.

Hoping for a good alternative client to appear, the writing is on the wall. Vaultwarden can't exist without "leeching" off of Bitwarden.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They responded on reddit and walked some of it back as an "oversight": https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitwarden/comments/1tdvnh7/comment/olznwcv/. Allegedly, I'm too lazy to verify.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is why corporate promises can never be trusted, because a new CEO can change those promises on a whim.

It's part of why despite being interested in Beeper, I never signed up for it because I had questions about if those privacy promises they made would be kept if they sold to a bigger company... which they eventually did.

On the plus side Bitwarden already made an official open source self-hosted version, which can be forked and/or return to the community developed Vaultwarden roots.

Meanwhile KeepassXC keeps on chugging along.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (8 children)

FYI beeper is really just matrix with bridges. Once I realized that I set up my own and now I have the same functionalities as beeper, self hosted, with a choice of clients.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] evil_andy@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 day ago

Well, poop.

[–] palmtrees2309@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] qwestjest78@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Once again, enshittification by the fucking suits.

Early on I decided to use only KeePass for full personal control instead of an online service. Didn't regret making that decision.

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago
[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 8 points 1 day ago

Hoping for another Moonlight/Sunshine moment! Already running Vaultwarden, rbw, and Keyguard. Just need a simple FOSS browser extension for autofill and editing entries.

For context, Moonlight was created first as a FOSS Nvidea gamestream client. Then Sunshine was created as a FOSS server implementation. Later, Nvidia dropped "official" support, now the two projects are a FOSS stack built atop a formerly proprietary protocol.

[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Glad I started using Vaultwarden a while back. Just need to find better apps for android and Firefox I guess because I'm guessing they're going to try to break compatibility.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Vaultwarden can't exist without "leeching" off of Bitwarden.

Why not? No reason mobile apps and browser extensions can't be forked.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mister_Hangman@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Clue me in on why vaultwarden can’t exist without it?

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It can, but vaultwarden, as it currently is, is an implementation of the server only. So if bitwarden decides to go closed source all the way, they'd haver to start either creating their own clients or fork the current bitwarden clients.

[–] scott@lem.free.as 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's fine. We just treat it as a fork from this point onwards.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›