this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
48 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12182 readers
700 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

And next week's announcement: "BC premier signs MOU with feds for pipeline to West Coast"

That it apparently all lies on indigenous groups to resist tells us exactly where this is going.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

If the pipeline proposal proceeds on the schedule we are given it will begin right around the time of the next Alberta provincial election and have been in process for a year for the next BC provincial election. Making Smith look strong for hers and Eby look weak for his.

Carney is more ideologically copacetic with Danielle Smith than he is with David Eby and seems like he is both fine with a UCP governed Alberta and would prefer a CPBC governed British Columbia.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

I don't like Eby's argument, because I'd rather it be denied for reasons based upon environmental and BC people's rights, but the argument itself is entirely reasonable.

If Smith is trying to get the feds to force a pipeline into B.C., and then B.C.'s energy is forced to compete on less favourable terms than Alberta's, that is fundamentally unfair.