this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
341 points (99.1% liked)

Memes

56322 readers
570 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 months ago

A lifeline or ‘dystopian’?

Yes, and drop the scare quotes.

[–] GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And before anyone says it: "But at least parking lots are more aesthetically pleasing than Soviet khrushchevkas and panelkas." And: "But China has ghost cities!"

Quick explainer: Khrushchevkas were the low-rise mass housing blocks from the Khrushchev era: thin walls, tiny kitchens, built fast and cheap. Panelkas came later under Brezhnev, taller and made of prefab concrete panels, equally grim. Both defined Soviet urban landscapes for decades. Both were cramped, often poorly insulated, and not visually inspiring. But sure, tell me a parking lot is an upgrade.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also Khrushchevkas were built because a lot of existing housing was destroyed during the war, and USSR needed to house millions of people quickly.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Weird that they didn’t just give them access to parking lots, that would have been way faster.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago

Say what you want about the aesthetics for Soviet era housing, most of them were surrounded by green space and playgrounds/trees when they were built. Which is more than we can say about modern 4-over apartments. The fact that they weren't kept up is more a sign of the times after they were built.

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago

Lifeline or dystopian? Yes. Yes it is.