this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
288 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

86354 readers
3757 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 98 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Even the headline is wrong. Jobs have already started disappearing due to AI.

[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I did some AI training a couple of years ago. Turned out I trained the AI to do what I was doing.

Fool me once...

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What job were you doing that AI can do it?

[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It was fairly basic, just analyzing audio tracks and extracting the dialogue from them to text. Simple stuff for AI now.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 1 month ago

I would love to see an AI trying to my job. It's useless at almost every aspect except for seeming like it knows what it's talking about.

So the higher ups who never know anything will listen to it, implemented it's dumb suggestions that are either unworkable or actually illegal and will burn the company to the ground. It would be hilarious if it weren't for the fact that I would be out of a job.

They want a new financial management solution (currently they're using some ancient thing on SAP) they've looked at a few solutions but they don't like any of them because they all cost a lot of money since they all go with the subscription model these days rather than just letting you buy the software in one big payment. They have actually considered letting an AI right some software for them. Should be fun.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] etherphon@piefed.world 46 points 1 month ago (13 children)

This article starts by earnestly quoting Steve Bannon so fuck it and fuck him.

We've at a very strange time, there is no question things will probably get ugly as they usually do in these uncomfortable transition periods between eras.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah - there's a fairly significant game of The Emperor's New Clothes going on, as the new set of impossibly wealthy assholes insist on pretending they're not impossibly wealthy assholes and instead try to force society into accommodating them, apparently entirely unaware of the simple fact that all they're doing is hastening the demise of the civilization that birthed them and on which they're little more than grossly destructive parasites.

And that's not an opinion - either mine or anyone else's. It's a simple fact that's been borne out by history over and over throughout the ages, and will be again, no matter how many comforting lies people tell themselves and each other.

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just don't get the lack of vision, these massive data centers are just such incredible wastes you have to be so deluded to think they are a good idea at this point in time, but here we go, these guys are all in on them. I hope it leads to their downfall since no one but them really wants them no matter how many emerging markets they get hooked on using their slop machines. Time will tell though.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The thing with the data centers is that the goal is entirely different from anything we've been told.

The key is that Google is implementing a system that allows people to get the information they're after directly from them rather than clicking theough to a website. That's undermining ad revenue, which not only threatens the existence of the websites but threatens Google's existing ad-based business model.

So it can only be the case that they're pivoting to a new business model.

And the key to that is the data centers.

Their goal, I grow more certain nearly every day, is to effectively privatize the internet by driving independent sites out of business, so that they (and their handful of more or less equally wealthy and powerful competitors) become the only source for all of that data they've already stolen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] austin@piefed.social 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Jobs are already disappearing. What is the author talking about?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yup lost my last job to ai

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Superorbit@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Jobs have already been disappearing. Entry level programming jobs have been wiped out.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good luck finding senior programmers in a decade eh

[–] AlJones@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're getting their money now. The future doesnt matter to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Senior positions are being let go too. My previous employer dropped almost all the senior people and replaced them with juniors with copilot accounts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s why these pedo losers all built bunkers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago

What I have noticed thispast year is that higher ups aren't really understanding the total cost of AI solutions. They go use sites to have conversations with the most powerful LLMs not realizing that your company is not going to afford that level of tech. Your current IT infrastucture can't add a few dozen high power/high cost systems to train the model for your business's nuance. It is never a build it and forget it problem.

Additionally there is a skill of humans being easily retrained for other tasks. Creating a Jack of All Trades will net you a great workforce with people filling roles when you have medical leave, turnover and business pivots. AI isn't general enough to make this change without major redesign.

The only "problem" with this amazing skill is that companies no longer run on the idea of employee retention. You get promoted by jumping ship. Working harder doesn't make the headway in a company like it used to 25+ years ago.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Lol please. America already gutted its entire industrial base to the point where there's a permanent shortage of blue collar jobs, and most people are working crappy wages in a service role for whichever megacorp owns the entire market.

AI could take over tomorrow and there wouldn't be enough people to care, despite getting utterly screwed over.

It might only get ugly if purchasing power collapses and causes solvency. Otherwise it'll just continue to degrade into an infinite debt economy which is basically just generational slavery like a significant portion of exploited labor and human trafficking already is.

Don't worry though, there's a million other problems that'll probably pop the bubble first anyway lol.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AI hasn't taken anyone's job.

The Epstein class use AI as an excuse to fire thousands and artificially lower wages to keep the plebs in check for the next few decades.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've personally seen multiple departments eliminated because they would rather send the jobs to Indian sub contractors backed by AI.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Right so it was outsourced to Indians. Thats old news.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I actually like using AI in my workplace to rid the need for tedious data entry. But i realised that if I told people about it, the management might see that they may not need me anymore so i won't teach anyone how to efficiently use AI.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Years ago, my wife took a job as the lone secretary to a lawyer with a high volume of paperwork, permit applications, etc. The previous secretary, who had retired, didn't like the computer, and just typed everything by hand.

My wife automated all the forms so she could jump from field to field, and get the paperwork done much faster. So fast in fact, that he decided not to hire the second secretary, and just dump it all on my wife. Then he turned out to be an absolute monster in so many ways that my wife just up and quit one day, which was fine with me.

But she had never told him about her automated forms that she created. He just thought her increased productivity was due to using the computer. So she told me that she made those forms to help herself, not him, and dumped all of them before she left, and he never knew.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah I am aware that managers will just put more jobs on to you if you do it quick. That's why I don't tell them if I finished a task early.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I had a shitty job for a while. A good chunk of my day was taken up with just running this one report. A coworker and I would alternate weeks.

Well I automated it. It still took me half the day to run it, but that's because I needed breaks to play with my daughter and pet my cat.

When I quit, I sent the automation to my coworker. No sense in her wasting her time.

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I work in IT and as such I work in AI because there's no getting away from the hype in my line of work.

But I don't believe in it and I think it can be very harmful for society. I see a few nice things about it (people with disabilities for example) but mostly negative.

To be honest I'm looking forward to the news of datacenters going up in flames. Which I'm pretty sure will happen when people start losing their jobs en masse.

[–] Lucelu2@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Or all the water in their state (see Utah) or raising the temps so high their power bills are the size of a mortgage.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 1 month ago

Don't even need to imagine yourself; this is one of the foundational pillars of the worldbuilding in the cyberpunk genre.

[–] spaceracoon@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder if there is a way to impose a tax if use, or better production, of LLM tokens. And that money could be spent ob social security.

Of course this is NEVER gonna happen 🤣

[–] Zorg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Since we're dealing with hyperbole, and I know this will sound preposterous, but what if had companies and the filthy rich pay their fair share of taxes 🤣

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm not really getting raises for a couple years, despite being a can do high performer. So now I just use AI to do mediocre work, and only work around 3-4hrs per day.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AI allows you to quiet quit without shitty bosses noticing. Win win :/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 10 points 1 month ago (10 children)

There are two big industries that are going to be the canaries in the coal mine, and be the first to take serious hits - Driving, and Fast Food.

Both Uber and Lyft make it clear on their websites that their future is an autonomous fleet, and they're testing heavily. Waymo has been testing for months, and is starting to roll out in many cities, including mine. Every one of those driverless cars is replacing a human job.

Further, many of the people driving rideshares, would be listed as unemployed, if they weren't able to eke out a meager living driving. Take away this job, and it isn't like they have a lot of options to pivot to. If they did, they wouldn't be driving. Those lost jobs are going straight to the unemployment rolls.

And what about truck drivers? That is another serious driving industry that is going to be fully replaced before long. Again, those drivers don't have a lot of other options.

Fast Food is the other one. Every fast food corp has been testing a robotic kitchen for years now, and I'd be surprised if even a single one isn't ready to roll out tomorrow. They are already getting us ready by both phasing in app use, and kiosk use, but also masking the kitchen area. It used to be that you could see the kitchens in fast food places, but new ones are hiding the prep area behind walls, where they can't be seen, because soon they'll all be automated.

Fast food is a traditional first job, or a second job, or a second income, or a supplement to retirement, etc. A LOT of households rely on fast food jobs, but within a decade, most of them will be fully automated.

Further, what will happen is that a robotic warehouse will load an autonomous truck, which will go to fully automated fast food outlets, where it will be robotically unloaded, stored, and eventually prepared, and served to a customer, without a human touching it anywhere along the way.

The tech to do all of that exists right now. The only reason they haven't done it is because they know the consumer backlash will be enormous, but they won't be able to resist the lure of all those new profits for too long, and somebody will finally take the plunge and be the first. They'll get savaged in the media, but then everyone will follow, and 10 years from now, every fast outlet will be automated, and millions of jobs will evaporate.

It's inevitable.

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fast food is already as automated as it can be. Replacing cooks with robot kitchen is looks good as a management dream, but anyone who tried it quickly discovers that you need industrial robots, and they are fuckng expensive, and you need engineers anyway to maintain them. So you are replacing cheap cooks with outrageously expensive engineers.

"But no", some ignorant CEO says, "we're not assembling cars, we don't need pneumatic robot arm that can lift 10 tons". Yeah, you still need a robot arm, and it's just a miniaturized industrial robot, not any much cheaper.

But robot kitchen exist, and they are actually very profitable. Go to your nearest grocery shop. 99% of items on the shelves were produced by a robot. Everything in a plastic wrap, everything in a jar, was produced on a conveyor. Even fresh produce involves some kind of automation.

So robots won't fry your potatoes, because french fries have really short shelf life. Otherwise they totally could, but hiring a cook is cheaper.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

With no system to benefit the unemployed workers, means that there is no more government of the people. usa will have shifted into a dystopic technocracy and the "food wars" of the poors will be a good betting scenario for all those tech bros experiencing "ennui". I'm confused about the slash "s" here but will add it anyway. /s

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 7 points 1 month ago

Don’t name your kid Al

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago
[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 month ago

Bullish on scrap yards. Death to clankers.

load more comments
view more: next ›