this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
288 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

86354 readers
3416 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 month ago

Bullish on scrap yards. Death to clankers.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I imagine lots of ugly social media posts promising ugly things but probably not a whole lot else, since "Revolt" isn't a clickable item on a menu. I'm speaking only as an American - we've become a people who buy bags of pre-shredded lettuce and pre-grated cheese. You can't expect much action from us if it takes us very far from a phone charger.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Loss of jobs is a distraction. People can get other jobs. If jobs can be automated cheaply, they should be. The problem is how the economy treats people who need to switch jobs and what it means for their income. Automate truck driving, please, but make sure ex-truck drivers are taken care of and can move on to other jobs that need doing.

Edit: I'll make an exception for jobs that need human interaction. There is a limit to automating things like care or service jobs because most people also need human interaction. And give those people decision making power, too, not this "computer says no" hellscape customer service workers have to go through

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

lotta of the doom and gloom from this thing is just symptoms from the worst underlying aspects of that unique US-dystopia. where most working class are 1 or 2 missed paychecks away complete ruin. the states/cities have better safety nets than others but across most of the country...might as well be non-existent outside of the handful of scraps the feds throw down (when those arent being actively fucked with by republicans)

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Nothing will happen.

Frogs in a pot of water being brought to a boil.

Those in charge will handwave away the job losses and blame some other factor for the economic downturn other their own shortsighted greed while they cry for their bailouts.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

As a random thought:

One problem peasants tended to face was (slow) population growth in the face of limited land to feed that population with. There's only so far that you can divide your farmlands between your sons before it's not enough to sustain them any more. Some might be able to find employment elsewhere, but you'd eventually be left with young people (men in particular) that were desperate for a livelihood and out of options.

You can imagine that some of them turned to violence. I wonder, how that would play out today. Circumstances differ, so I'd caution transferring past patterns onto current situations is prone to error, but there is some tendency in human social dynamics to repeat. Not necessarily in results, but in mentality at least.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I mean, being against AI is not really a long-term solution. It's just pushing the can further down the road. Eventually, a lot of jobs will be lost anyways, due to conventional automation that has already happened the last 200 years. Progress is not an infinite story. It brings us from A to B and once we're there, it's the end of progress. Without progress, there are very few jobs, and there's absolutely no way that there'll be enough jobs for everybody in 30 years from now, AI or no AI. i don't see the protests against AI changing anything at all about that, even if they were effective (which they are very clearly not btw).

Really we need to find a way to organize society around something else than perpetual work. Only then can we find peace. I propose formulating laws around a society using universal basic income or some equivalent thereof (such as universal basic services). Just write a proposal for these laws, because only once there are meaningful proposals, we can actually demand politicians to implement them. So just start thinking about it now. The sooner, the better.

[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

All of this sounds delusional, neither the corporations nor the government care about their people. the jobless will be bulldozed like the people in gaza and lebanon, the kind of necropolitics that have been happening in the global south for decades are coming for the west.

[–] Crit@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I don't think people have a problem with progress as a concept, but the AI shift is a major hit on the job market and therefore the economy and governments are failing the people. Not only that but the replacements are subpar and generally make things worse and add a huge amount of technical debt. People are losing livelihoods in a system that doesn't care for them and hasn't cared for them in ages, and it's all decided by business suits that fall for weak marketing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The people driving AI are the kind of people that have amassed hundreds of billions while paying their workers as little as possible.

Do you really think they will work towards a universal basic income?

They're even admitting it. Sam Altman was saying something like "yeah big disruption is coming and society will have to find a way to deal with it". In other words "I'll profit but good luck with your fucked up society, no help from me there".

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Do you really think they will work towards a universal basic income?

probably, if we let it simmer for a few more years. an UBI would actually be good for the economy. they're "growth-oriented" (greedy), not stupid.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›