this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
1078 points (97.6% liked)

Flippanarchy

2527 readers
472 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 6 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Yes, but ftr, there's already a film with this premise.

Some 2010's pseudo-thriller with Justin Timberlake that had a super generic name like "On Time" that I can't quite remember. I don't know if it's any good, because one really stupid line from the trailer I recall "4 minutes for a cup of coffee?!" with the most lackluster delivery still lives rent free in my head, and I couldn't bring myself to watch it lol

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

It was okay.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] joan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

this is a great oversimplification!! albeit an oversimplification

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd give all my money to turn back the hours...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

This is exactly how I think about my money. I'm confused why not many other people do this. It really makes you think twice about what you spend your money on a lot of times.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Okay but compare two writers. One writer works years on one book and the other is Stephen King. Should the book of the writer who toils to finish one book be more expensive than the book of the writer who finished his book in a matter of weeks when these books are the same length ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

nice one

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This only works as a minimum for menial jobs, and if everyone gets 1000 hours every month, no matter their circumstances, and jobs give more hours the harder and more dangerous they are.

May as well call them "credit" instead, since it'd have to be actually detached from hours.

But if you only have credits, you end up with capitalism again.

We need two more currencies: karma and laurels.

You'd get karma when you do stuff that is helpful to others; it doesn't matter if you do it for selfish reasons, as long as it helps others. You'd get laurels when you do stuff no one has done before. Karma and laurels would be non-transferable.

Karma would represent how much you help society, so society pays back. You could spend karma to pay lower taxes and even to directly get credits from the government. Maybe other benefits too, depending on technological advancements.
Laurels would let you call 'dibs' on stuff. Like being able to benefit exlusively for something you invented. The better the invention and the more it benefits people, the more laurels you get and the longer the exclusivity you can maintain before it becomes public domain.

Now we just need some sort of benign gestalt AI like in the Culture books to ensure karma and laurels are accounted impartially.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Greatly expressed!

I think this whole thing about evaluating how valuable our time is is bonkers.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There was a movie like that.

[–] psion1369@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

In Time. I love that movie.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

A friend of mine wrote a short scifi story where people living on a space station were paid in "keeptime" which you used for everything, including paying for lofe support. Basically the epstein class's dream there: captive population with nowhere to escape to, completely dependent on you even for air.

[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Why is it that half the posts i see from this comm use the logic of a child?

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Guess they have to keep up with their day job of posting 10-20 posts a day, lots of it is going to be brimstone

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Movie "Out of Time" did this. Oligarchy was definitely not solved by this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Comrade_Spood@quokk.au 3 points 1 week ago

Close enough, welcome back Josiah Warren /s

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I see a lot of folk have spotted the skilled work issue.

Perhaps a slight solve to this isn't making education free, but actually counting those hours as work.

Like, be paid to be educated.

The fallout of this, of course, is that we have to let go of the notion that anybody can do anything. Strict skills based examinations and vastly increased competition for some jobs.

Ultimately a lot of people will be forced into working jobs they don't want, especially those with disabilities.

Oh wait, I think we've just rediscovered Ayn Rand by accident.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

I think some kind of system where you bank those hours and they multiply your rate when you actually work, paying back the hours you studied after you've proven you can succeed.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›