this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
520 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

85168 readers
4924 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] himmyguap@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Stanford, you know what to do this MFer. Prepare your boo army.

[–] ViscloReader@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The world when it's my time to be an adult

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

consequences such as parasites such as him maybe making less money. oh the horror

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 6 points 1 week ago
[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Right back at ya

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I think both sides are correct. AI will be still around a decade and centuries from now, and AI poses great risks. The real question is, "Who controls it?"

Hopefully the students do not try to destroy the loom, but instead try to make sure that they are so common and easy to use, that corporations do not have genuine control over the usage of AI. Every minority should have a digital lawyer that has 95% of the ability of Disney's, to protect people from Kavenaugh Stops. Every poor person should be able to manage their finances just as well as the most blueblooded billionaire. Every household should own a home server and a robot, leasing their usage to corporations. Those corporations shouldn't own the AI nor robots.

What I am saying, is that we should structure society to ensure that the worst people are not our masters forevermore. Their goal is to control the means of production, and to remove our lives from the process. Both figuratively AND literally.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

the only consequence of a world without ai is a smooth running industrial powerhouse that increases the value of its people and marketshares. continued use of ai reduces marketshare as well as production output while also shrinking the customer base

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, it'll be like the impact on the ocean of someone taking their toe out of the water.

The next big thing won't come from Google. It's just doing portfolio management, sustaining and milking me-too products like their web apps and Google Cloud while enshittifying them, and hoping they'll get lucky with one of their many incubator projects. Odds are, they won't. They lack the agility and aren't hungry anymore.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›