may soon be able to
this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
639 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
84923 readers
3436 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Building codes should probably include Faraday-cage type shielding.
That would prevent cell signals from inside, making it harder to (e.g.) call the fire department, or an ambulance.
the return of landlines is nigh
Honestly, we'd be better off at this point.
That could be fixed by using WiFI calling, getting a VoIP line or installing a cell booster.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I'm wondering if some types of crystal can absorb or distort the signals enough to make you harder to identify. I mean I guess you'd be "that guy with the crystals in his pocket" and would be easy to correlate to ~~CCTV~~ flock, but if everyone does it it could create a layer of obscuration.
Especially things with piezoelectric and/or electromagnetic effects. I'm thinking mainly along the lines of quartz, tourmaline, pyrite, tiger's eye (hematite/jasper), shungite, etc.
It would be worth experimenting with if anyone tries that open source software another commenter linked...
You’d just need metal for this.
I guess lining hats with tinfoil is no longer solely for the paranoid...
Kinda defeats the purpose of wifi
load more comments
(1 replies)
It‘s like the phone sonar tech from the Dark Knight everyone said was total BS but totally real…
Comcast routers already have a feature to detect people's presence.
The Dark Knight tech was a lot closer than we realized in 2008.
back to ethernet where possible
Router and WiFi Access Point are different things. There are tons of routers that do not have WiFi.
Most people in a “technology” forum completely understand this and yet are also still capable of reading and understanding TFA.
No. People here are conflating all routers (what our dumb dumb government forbade) with wifi access points, alleging that the wifi surveillance capability is the reason for the probibition.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Hmm. The article appears to conflate multiple things?
One of them is “viewing” the RF spectrum to build up an image. The other is reading the unencrypted beamforming data from a router. That second one depends on people carrying a WiFi-capable piece of electronics with them doesn’t it? There has to be something for the beam to focus on, some sort of beacon signal.
Although I guess all it really needs is for the person to step between the router and a device connected to the router; that should enable analysis of the disruption patterns.
I don't think a person has to carry anything. The tracking is based on measuring the interference a moving person (or a dog) creates between the router and a connected device like a range extender or a networked printer.
Ill just start wearing a mask full time when this happens. Fuck this.
load more comments
(3 replies)
DOUBT
This information is several years old...
Would carrying around some sort of Wifi disruptor help against this? It would likely have to be a passive persistent effect, not something like an EMP (but those we can reserve for particularly annoying snoopers).
I'm not sure about wifi but cell jamming has been heavily criminalized and tracked
We are already being so criminalized for existing, so what?
wifi jamming would be much more localized and would affect far fewer people than a cell jammer
load more comments
(3 replies)
What's stopping me from building my own router?
Nothing. Get a mini pc with 2 or more ethernet ports and install openwrt or opnsense or maybe others I haven't tried, get a standalone wifi AP so if you ever want to upgrade anything you can do it separately, get a network switch to connect additional wired computers or wifi APs.
Then get in all the homelab groups and find the coolest stuff you also want and start making the home network made by you and for you.
If you already have a wifi router that can be flashed with custom firmware you can also use that to start out and use it as a wifi access point for a more powerful pc router later
Knowing how.
All routers are just Linux computers managing slightly better than average network cards. (Home routers, obviously. Beefy carrier hardware is different).
A basic setup is essentially installing Linux and then running a handful of commands for packet forwarding. The figuring out how to do it without wifi crashing will take longer because that software is wonky.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I mean, I obsessively hardwire all my devices, only my phone uses WiFi.
This just gives me a reason to skip using a WiFi Access Point entirely and just routing my phone through my home network via my Wireguard VPN which I already do for adblocking.
Doesn't help as much if you live in a bunch of cramped apartments and there's a lot of WiFi around you though.
load more comments
(1 replies)