this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
287 points (93.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7069 readers
2015 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Guess it’s time to seek out rsync alternatives

[–] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago

Openrsync from openbsd (disclaimer: have not tried it)

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

Borg for backups, sftp for file transfer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (30 children)

I'm no fan of vibe coded apps but rsync is literally free software with a free licence... forking it seems like less work than harrassing the guy who maintains in the hope that he capitulates.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago (18 children)

We dont have the capacity to replace like 50% of all open source devs. We just have to hope that they get their shit together again.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's up to them how they develop their completely free software. If you're not happy with it and can't stop using it, you can fork it. If you can't do it yourself, you pay someone else to. If it suddenly seems like paying for 50% of your FOSS is too much, then consider that the FOSS devs themselves pay for most of it with their largely uncompensated free time and probably want to have a bit more of said free time back.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do they make money? Like they're consultants and make plenty of money and then spend some free time maintaining OSS projects?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 week ago

Usually they're just regular software engineers who spend some of their free time on FOSS. Very few projects earn enough in donations to pay salaries.

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean. What they need is help. Other people who can code who are willing to contribute time to the help maintain the project.

Burnout is real and I don't think "getting their shit together" actually fixes anything. The next time they burn out we wash rinse repeat?

[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Considering the pool of open source power maintainers is shrinking year by year and no fresh blood seems to come forward, I wonder what next time will look like? If you add the frank hostility from the community I don't see what could motivate people to start helping on high profile projects

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago

That's my question about people who are now looking to jump to a fork. When the fork maintainer can't keep up, what's happens?

I wish I did have a solution to put forward to get people interested in helping on these kinds of projects (or the relevant skills). I don't have an answer, but this really just sucks.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I wonder when they will add layers of abstraction. Using one AI model to tell another AI model what to do.

[–] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

This is already how subagent workflows work

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Half the devs using AI have handed their critical thought over to it, so they're already basically an AI model telling another AI model what to do.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 1 week ago

Probably using speech to text so, that's already happening.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›