this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
663 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

85278 readers
4285 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"This is it. We're dead. We're going to die right here in the Waymo."

This combined with another recent article from some insiders at Tesla saying, along the lines, "You couldn't pay me to let one of these things drive me somewhere."

And yet I still know people who are just so chuffed about "never having to drive again."

EDIT: Comments have pointed out that this story is, at best, overblown and semi-fabricated otherwise. Take it with a massive grain of salt. But feel free to discuss self-driving, waymo, etc in the comments!

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm all for self driving car tech, but not with goals of perpetual revenue generation.

Give me something that is an addon to any car without any subscription or maintenance fees so I can just have it installed in my own car or in a few family cars, otherwise i'm truly not interested in providing yet another techbro for pay to use technology full of day 1 enshittification goals that include paying workers absolutely nothing.

We all know that by the time real self driving cars are established they will cost as much or more than paying an actual human to do the job and all profit goes into the hands of a few. It's just like what they're going for with AI overall.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yeh, ill drive my own vehicle thanks

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

A 2nd robot car pulled it over.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Machinery is required to have a big red STOP button that will immediately stop all moving parts. For emergencies. I assume these cars don't have something like that? Maybe they should be required to; stop and unlock all doors.

/edit: I see it's mentioned/suggested in some other comments as well.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Haha i just made a similar comment. I should copy past your edit.

I think I'll just delete mine

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

It just dawned on me that no matter what, we have a wasted seat on self-driving taxis because we still put a wheel and pedals that are expected to go unused in the vehicle. I think this would help highlight just how unsafe this concept really is. With the wheel and pedals there, maybe it’s giving people more of an illusion of control or something, because I feel like having nothing there would make people a lot less comfortable, even though that’s the reality of the situation.

Edit: people keep bringing up ways this could be used, and that we do it for cost-cutting, but this still doesn’t detract from the reality of how they were actually deployed before these concerns were addressed. They’re not even commenting on it and letting the consumer fill in their PR’s gaps for them.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They’re retrofitting existing cars. Leaving the steering wheel and pedals means they don’t spend money removing them. It also means they can remove the lidar bolt ons, and resell them as normal used cars later.

For more than three passengers, they’ll probably retrofit a larger vehicle like a van or an suv.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'd be more comfortable if the self-driving vehicle I was riding in had a way for me to take direct control in case of emergencies.

Not having a wheel or pedals to actually control the vehicle in case of emergency gets you situations like in the article.

Of course that would require either someone sitting in the driver's seat, or making it easy to get into the driver's seat.

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

With a wheel a shifter, and pedals, you can put the vehicle in neutral and push it out of the road if it dies or something. It doesn't make sense to get rid of them.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

The idea is that you can do both manual and automated driving with one vehicle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homes@piefed.world 2 points 1 week ago

Well, that was only a matter of time

[–] sevenoverthree@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Sue the fucking ever loving shit out of waymo. Kill this fucking company.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Humans crash cars all the time, and yet I still know people who are just so chuffed about "not having to drive" because they're going in their friend's car.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

And yet I still know people who are just so chuffed about “never having to drive again.”

Personally I'd be happy to use fully automatic car and never drive again unless I really want to. The coffin on wheels with T in front just isn't one of those. And none of the other brands aren't there either.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›